Musically, I didn't care for Ms. LuPone's performance. I thought it was consistently belt-y and more like Ethel Merman than her original, more nuanced performance of the song. One example that stands out for me was how she belted out, "I ne-ver ex-PEC-ted it to", and hit and held that second syllable of 'expected'.
I didn't feel like the orchestra was with her regarding the liberties she took with the tempos of the recitative. Neither was I a fan of the change she made to the rhythmic line of the lyric, "Don't cry for me Argentina". I prefer the smoother triplets.
In spite of the elements I didn't like musically, I enjoyed every second of the performance. Patti LuPone is (IMO) a perfect example for how to take command of a stage. I wish the sound engineers had better captured the audience applause the second she began the refrain, as well as the applause when she raised her arms for the classic Evita "balcony arms". And was that a tear she wiped away at the end? I felt - and loved - the emotion of "but all you have to do is look at me to know" in her Grammy version of the song.
I have a LOT of respect for how Patti LuPone is growing. Can she still sing the Evita she sang in her youth? Nope. But - she still uses her voice with the same effectiveness that's always been there, and there doesn't seem to be any hint of declination - just change. Her instrument has evolved with age, and she's adapted how she uses it, to great effect.
To my mind, Evita is still "hers", but it's definitely part of her past, not her present. Her present is just as vibrant as her past though, albeit different.
Updated On: 1/29/18 at 08:04 AM