Nicole Scherzinger doubling down on the MAGA Train

[ER765]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:04pm

 Embarrassing.

Full post she liked for “context”: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOhXw2wjF6-/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

https://ibb.co/JFzpR1gV

Updated On: 9/14/25 at 11:04 PM

[EDSOSLO858]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:08pm

Well, at least that clears up any potential confusion from the SUNSET fracas.

And there go my dreams of her eventually getting to play Viola Van Horn.

[CoffeeBreak]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:10pm

She'll be fine.  She's already in talks for other roles.  

Updated On: 9/14/25 at 11:10 PM

[nativenewyorker2]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:12pm

Regardless of her political views she was never gonna replace in a role like Viola van Horne right after winning a Tony for Lead Actress

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:14pm

Her performance in SB was astonishing. It’s a shame she’s such an ignorant sh*thead when it comes to politics. She clearly didn’t learn any sort of lesson from the hat debacle. 

Unfortunate. Very much so. 

And with a night at Carnegie Hall on the docket?  Yikes. 

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:17pm

CoffeeBreak said: "She'll be fine."

Uh, I don’t think anyone’s concerned for HER…

[MB124]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:18pm

Oh, this’ll be fun. 
 

What a moron. What a shame. 

Updated On: 9/14/25 at 11:18 PM

[TheatreFan4]

Posted: 9/14/25 at 11:40pm

Nicole saw Kristin get attention and just had to get her little one in. 

[BJR]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 12:06am

What a damn shame. It's wild watching people go from supporting Obama to being MAGA. Antithetical, and wild. 

[The Bandstand]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 1:05am

I was completely bewildered by her performance in Sunset.  She did nothing for me, unlike when I saw Glenn Close who rocked my world.  I don’t know a single person who thought Nicole’s performance was more worthy than Audra’s.  My understanding is it took a lot of coaxing to get people to vote for her.  It’s not really a performance the Tony’s are prone to award.  It just came across as, “well let’s give someone else a chance.”

[BorisTomashevsky]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 1:38am

ER765 said: "Embarrassing.

Full post she liked for “context”:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOhXw2wjF6-/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

https://ibb.co/JFzpR1gV"


This is easily misinterpreted. At a glance it looks like - based on the title of the thread -  that Charlie messaged Nicole saying “You are terrific” and that Nicole wrote back “Jusr doing my part my MAGA brother.”

In reality Charlie (the racist!) told a black guy he was terrific, and the black guy (clearly a self-racist!) called Charlie his MAGA brother. 

Nicole liked the black guy’s post.

Who cares what people like.

Your post scored a glorious own goal for the anti-Charlie team, as it demonstrates that Charlie wasn’t a racist at all, and that he has the support of a black person. 

All told, I think the clear conservative supporters on Broadway are the tip of the iceberg. Any others are laying low as they know they’d be cancelled. We should cancel everyone now for safety. Any unintended leftist losses via the wholesale cancellation will be for the greater good, and they’ll understand their sacrifice. 

[The Distinctive Baritone]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 1:59am

Yeah it’s really not clear what is going on in this screenshot. Is she saying “You are terrific” to Charlie Kirk? I’m confused.

[binau]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 2:22am

Well, Nicole has the tony now so she doesn’t need any of you. You can go after Chenoweth, you can go after Nicole but you really should be looking inward and really be going after yourselves because you do not understand the war that has been started. Especially now that, according to the BBC, the shooter’s partner was transgender so this in combination with all other details (the shooter according to the BBC suggesting that Charlie Kirk was full of hate and spread hate, the Bullet casing saying hey, fascist catch! The anti-fascist lyrics) is making the motive more and more likely to be extreme left wing ideologically motivated terrorism and to suggest otherwise defies logic and reason. 

This is an October the 7th situation right now - in this metaphor Hamas has committed a terrorist attack. If you want to avoid Gaza you need to be acknowledging this, distancing yourself from this and being reasonable (obviously I acknowledge it's not quite the same scale and severity but for analogy sake). 

If you think the appropriate response is to start or continue a war with the right, including being antagonistic by celebrating this death, you will likely suffer negative consequences from the inevitable backlash.  Please. You cannot win this battle. You can’t win this. It’s only going to make it worse please just stop.

As I have been describing for years, sometimes you have to concede, you have to put the weapons down and now is that time. You will not win this and you are putting lives at risk by contributing to this culture.  There is no way you can win against the metaphorical Israel in this analogy. If you try like Hamas, Gaza self destruction is assured. 
 
Do you want to be Gaza on October the 6th or Gaza now after fighting a long, bloody war?

Updated On: 9/15/25 at 02:22 AM

[ER765]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:17am

The Distinctive Baritone said: "Yeah it’s really not clear what is going on in this screenshot. Is she saying “You are terrific” to Charlie Kirk? I’m confused."

What is confusing? 

She liked the post that I linked, where a pro-MAGA-poster vehemently defends Charlie Kirk as some kind of peace-loving, non-racist person, completely whitewashing Kirk’s well documented legacy of racism and ignorance. 

[ER765]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:17am

BorisTomashevsky said: "ER765 said: "Embarrassing.

Full post she liked for “context”:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOhXw2wjF6-/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

https://ibb.co/JFzpR1gV"


This is easily misinterpreted. At a glance it looks like - based on the title of the thread - that Charlie messaged Nicole saying “You are terrific” and that Nicole wrote back “Jusr doing my part my MAGA brother.”

In reality Charlie (the racist!) told a black guy he was terrific, and the black guy (clearly a self-racist!) called Charlie his MAGA brother.

Nicole liked the black guy’s post.

Who cares what people like.

Your post scored a glorious own goal for the anti-Charlie team, as it demonstrates that Charlie wasn’ta racist at all, and that he has the support of a black person.

All told, I think the clear conservative supporters on Broadway are the tip of the iceberg. Any others are laying low as they know they’d be cancelled. We should cancel everyonenow for safety. Any unintended leftist losses via the wholesale cancellation will be for the greater good, and they’ll understand their sacrifice."

Of course you’re defending her. Right on cue. 

[ER765]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:18am

binau said: "Well, Nicole has the tony now so she doesn’t need any of you. You can go after Chenoweth, you can go after Nicole but you really should be looking inward andreally be going after yourselves because you do not understand the war that has been started. Especially now that, according to the BBC, the shooter’s partner was transgender so this in combination with all other details (the shooter according to the BBC suggesting that Charlie Kirk was full of hate and spread hate, the Bulletcasing saying hey, fascist catch! The anti-fascist lyrics) is making the motive more and more likely to be extreme left wing ideologically motivated terrorism and to suggest otherwise defies logic and reason.

This is an October the 7th situation right now - in this metaphor Hamas has committed a terrorist attack. If you want to avoid Gaza you need to be acknowledging this, distancing yourself from this and being reasonable.

If you think the appropriate responseis to start or continue a warwith the right, including being antagonistic by celebrating this death, you are going to suffer the consequences please don’t. Please. You cannot win this battle. You can’t win this. It’s only going to make it worse please just stop.

As I have been describing for years, sometimes you have to concede, you have to put the weapons down and now is that time. You will not win this and you are putting lives at risk by contributing to this culture. There is no way you can win against the metaphorical Israel in this analogy. If you try like Hamas, Gaza self destruction is assured.


Do you want to be Gaza on October the 6th or Gaza now after fighting a long, bloody war?"

Well, this is an absolutely bonkers hot take. 

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:24am

The Distinctive Baritone said: "Yeah it’s really not clear what is going on in this screenshot. Is she saying “You are terrific” to Charlie Kirk? I’m confused."

Huh? 

Did you even click the link the OP posted, with the descriptor “Full post she liked”…? 

She liked the post that is linked. 

The DMs are not from or to her directly.

What are you confused by?

[binau]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:29am

Which part? That the ideological motives are likely left wing extremism? (All evidence points to that and it would be very difficult indeed to suggest otherwise now if the premises above are true - I accept new information might contradict this but it’s the best we have right now.
 

That this was a terrorist attack? It was. This is the pure definition of a terrorist attack. That people on the left are supporting or glorifying this attack? They are, as we have established in another thread some here (not all) and many online literally support this terrorist attack and support violence to achieve their political goals. This is the definition of terrorism. 

That you have started a war? You have. Do you not pay attention to what ‘the enemy’ are doing and saying right now? 
 

That you will lose this war? You will. This is yet another example - but the most extreme and most horrific - of extreme left wing overreach that is counterproductive to the cause. The left have put trans people at risk, gay people at risk. They have made this country more divided and racist. The world is worse off because of your extreme ideology, not better. You have achieved the opposite of what you intend to. 

And it’s amazing and incredible that instead of what you should be doing - which is listening to every left wing and democratic leader in the USA and condemning this attack you decide to continue this extreme ideology. Continuing this ‘cancel culture’. Continuing to indulge and associate with others (or be the others) who are glorifying terrorism.

The path forward is to support Gavin Newsom for president, to stop calling everyone you disagree with Nazis and racists and fascists, to concede common sense things such as agreeing biological men should not be in women’s sports and that children should not be subject to irreversible medical procedures in the name of ‘gender affirming care’ .

That is all much of the right and reasonable centrists want. Instead, you haven’t conceded and you’ve waged a war that you’re not going to win. 
 


 

Updated On: 9/15/25 at 04:29 AM

[ER765]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:39am

binau said: "Which part? That the ideological motives are likely left wing extremism? (All evidence points to that and it would be very difficult indeed to suggest otherwise now if the premises above are true - I accept new information might contradict this but it’s the best we have right now.


That this was a terrorist attack? It was. This is the pure definition of a terrorist attack. That people on the left are supporting or glorifying this attack? They are, as we have established in another thread some here (not all) and many online literally support this terrorist attack and support violence to achieve their political goals. This is the definition of terrorism.

That you have started a war? You have. Do you not pay attention to what ‘the enemy’ are doing and saying right now?


That you will lose this war? You will. This is yet another example - but the most extreme and most horrific - of extreme left wing overreach that is counterproductive to the cause. The left have put trans people at risk, gay people at risk. They have made this country more divided and racist. The world is worse off because of your extreme ideology, not better. You have achieved the opposite of what you intend to.

And it’s amazing and incredible that instead of what you should be doing - which is listening to every left wing and democratic leader in the USA and condemning this attack you decide to continue this extreme ideology. Continuing this ‘cancel culture’. Continuing to indulge and associate with others (or be the others) who are glorifying terrorism.

The path forward is to support Gavin Newsom for president, to stop calling everyone you disagree with Nazis and racists and fascists, to concede common sense things suchas agreeing biological men should not be in women’s sports and that children should not be subject to irreversible medical procedures in the name of ‘gender affirming care’ .

That is all much of the right and reasonable centrists want. Instead, you haven’t conceded and you’ve waged a war that you’re not going to win.



"

There is truly so much wrong with this “argument” and so many insane dots being connected and leaps in logic being made, including your implications that I am “celebrating” Kirk’s death or “glorifying terrorism”. Or that I am “starting” a war by holding someone accountable. The only person who “started” any kind of “war” was Kirk, with his bigoted, inflammatory, hateful rhetoric. 

Who is even talking about the shooters’ motivations or ideologies? This isn’t about that. It’s about whitewashing Charlie Kirk’s legacy.

You don’t even know what you’re talking about and I truly don’t have the energy to go back and forth with you, responding to your ridiculous post(s). 

Truly idiotic. Grateful for the block feature. 

Updated On: 9/15/25 at 04:39 AM

[Ensemble1757638854]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:44am

Yikes, is it just me, or are politicians becoming increasingly divisive? I remember when a local councilor shared a questionable meme a while back, and the backlash was intense. It made me realize how carefully we need to consider the messages we amplify.

[binau]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 4:58am

I am not necessarily talking about you as an individual, I’m talking about the cultural construct that many here are part of and contributing. Which you have just exposed in your own post. If you say the ‘only person’ who started a war is the person who was a victim of a terrorist attack, you’re implying that the fact he was gunned down for expressing his views is simply part and parcel of his own behaviour and that he had it coming for the reasons you suggest. You are not taking any accountability.

But the problem you have is, if you look at what is happening online and in the statements of right wing leaders, this isn’t going to just go away. People will be held accountable. The ideology that led to this is going to be challenged in the most authoritarian and combative ways. This is the war I am referring to. Meanwhile reasonable every day people, trans people, gay people are all going to be caught in the crossfire which is not fair. They just want to live their lives not be involved in this violence.  

If you or anyone else just dismisses my posts as ‘idiotic’ without actually responding it more reflects your inability to argue, your inability to reason. Not mine. 

Remember, YOU JUST SAID that "THE ONLY" person who 'started this war' is Charlie Kirk, a man who was shot killed for expressing his own views in a country that values freedom of speech. If you honestly believe this, you are part of the problem and you have no idea what is coming to you. For your own safety and the safety of others you need to de-radicalise yourselves. Please.

Updated On: 9/15/25 at 04:58 AM

[ER765]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 5:04am

binau said: "If you or anyone else just dismisses my posts as ‘idiotic’ without actually responding it more reflects your ability to argue, your inability to reason. Not mine."

Whatever helps you sleep at night, dear. 🙄 

Good night. 

Updated On: 9/15/25 at 05:04 AM

[binau]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 5:08am

For someone that wants to use the block feature, it doesn't look like it's working lol. 

Remember, YOU JUST SAID that "THE ONLY" person who 'started this war' is Charlie Kirk, a man who was shot killed for expressing his own views in a country that values freedom of speech. If you honestly believe this, you are part of the problem and you have no idea what is coming to you (from the backlash associated with this murder). For your own safety and the safety of others you need to de-radicalise yourselves. Please.

Updated On: 9/15/25 at 05:08 AM

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 5:17am

binau said: "Remember, YOU JUST SAID that "THE ONLY" person who 'started this war' is Charlie Kirk, a man who was shot killed for expressing his own views in a country that values freedom of speech. If you honestly believe this, you are part of the problem and you have no idea what is coming to you. For your own safety and the safety of others you need to de-radicalise yourselves. Please."

I generally really respect your takes, binau, but this is NOT it. 

Kirk was not some innocent conversation-starter who simply wanted to have constructive dialogue with people he disagreed with. He was a racist, a homophobe, a sexist, a Genocide-supporter… the list goes on and on. This is all documented. In his own words. It’s not even up for debate.

Did he deserve to be murdered? Absolutely not. But HE was the radical person in this equation, constantly stoking the flames of fear and division. His legacy speaks for itself and it shouldn’t be whitewashed now that he’s gone. 

“What is coming for you”…? What does that even mean? 

[binau]

Posted: 9/15/25 at 5:32am

Abcd12, I think I can agree on much of what you’ve said (as always I do think the summary of his positions or who he was is not 100% accurate but I absolutely accept he was a conservative Christian whose views would be intolerable to many).

And no one has to mourn Charlie Kirk’s death or agree with his views. But you should be shocked and horrified that someone has been killed for expressing their first amendment right. If someone says ‘the only person’ that started this war is the person who was a victim of a terrorist attack then it’s clear that there is extremism going on this thread and there is no shock or horrified reaction to this attack on free speech - which is extremely fringe and goes against practically every single left wing and democrat leader.
 

This is exactly what Hamas would say if they were criticised for October the 7th ‘the only person who started this war was Israel because of their oppression’. Or what the Charlie Hebdo attackers would say ‘the only person who started this war was the people who printed hateful things’ (ie blasphemy). 

Terrorism is not ok and it’s not ok now. In terms of ‘what is coming for you’ - are you not paying attention to what is happening on the right? Do you really only look at information that seeks to reinforce your own views? Look at Elon Musk’s twitter feed if you want to see where this is headed. Just as Israel responded to the October the 7th attack ‘the right’ are preparing to come down hard. We can only hope that there will not be more violence, but I predict an extreme authoritarian response and some violence. Do you really think starting a battle with ‘the right’ who have guns, loads of guns, and who act in ways you suggest are authoritarian and fascist, is going to end well for you? (I don’t mean you personally I’m talking about the wider cultural construct as discuss). 
 

The best thing anyone can do right now for the left wing cause is to protect freedom of speech and to try and get Gavin Newsom into office. That should be your number 1 goal, not going after people who were shocked at Kirk’s death or openly supporting his death as too many are.