I don't rely on critics (professional or amateur) to determine whether I will see a show. Reviews are no more than someone else's opinion and one need only consider the most recent U.S. presidential election to see that public opinion of any given thing often differs wildly (and perhaps inexplicably).
Most of my all-time favorite shows were panned by critics and I would have missed out on those experiences if I'd allowed myself to be swayed by their reviews. Inversely, there are numerous critically acclaimed shows that hold little appeal for me and I'm simply not going to spend $100+ to see them.
The most consistently reliable outside indicator of quality that I've found is the Twitter comments of performers in the business when they see a show. For example, actors whom I follow have compelled me to see shows like Matilda The Musical and The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, which I might not otherwise have considered. A few years ago while in New York, my husband and I were trying to decide how to fill an empty slot in our itinerary and we happened to walk past the Shubert Theatre, where I noticed the new Matilda marquee. Having read numerous positive Tweets from London performers about this show, I turned to him and said, "I know this doesn't look like something for us, but I have a feeling about it and I'm going to ask you to trust me". We both loved it, so much that we bought the cast recording and went back to see it again during a subsequent trip. Our experience with Curious Incident was similar.
==> this board is a nest of vipers <==
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene"
- Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage
Updated On: 3/17/17 at 09:42 AM