THE GLASS MENAGERIE Previews (2017 Revival) — Page 6

It's a sad fact that in the 1930's unless you were a young woman from very wealthy means, if you were wheelchair bound and living with your single mother you probably would be expected to the live the rest of your life as a ward of your parent. When Amanda tells Laura that her "defect" is barely noticeable it's baffling in this production. Being in a wheelchair is noticeable in any time period, but especially when coming from a poor family in the South in the 1930's. As others have mentioned, Laura walks around town when she should be at class; Amanda forcefully nags Laura to run an errand at one point and after seeing how long it took Laura to climb the stairs to their apartment earlier, Amanda comes across as downright cruel.

When Laura simply has a limp her mental issues are more pronounced because she's imagining that the limp is a greater hindrance to having a "normal" life than it is. If Laura literally can't walk then she's not imaging anything at all. She (shamefully) would be an outcast in the environment in which she is living. This idea twists Williams' intentions in ways that were, well not intended.

Perhaps we could forgive some of this if Ferris were giving an absolutely transporting performance, but as it stands she's not, which only amplifies the problem and makes it feel all the more like exploitation.

Yikes... should I sell my tickets??

Yeah, I'm peacing out on this too.

Sally Field is not "stuck" in this production. I'm sure she knew the concept before signing on. Shame to hear about Mantello - his performance in THE NORMAL HEART is one of the best I've seen onstage.

I saw this on Friday Night and while I was not in love with this production, I did enjoy it. I should preface this by saying this was my first experience seeing Menagerie. I really enjoyed Mantello in the role and he was my personal favorite in this production. I thought Field was also very good. I had a hard time seeing the gentleman caller scene from the last row of the Mezz due to the lighting choice, which while I did love made it hard for me to catch some of the subtleties in his performance. I would have to agree that Laura was a pretty one note performance from where I was sitting and anything I felt for the character was a result of Gold using the actress's disability to manipulate feeling. I didn't have a problem with the minimalist scenic and lighting design and loved some of the special moments that Gold put into place. The ending really bothered me though. On my ride back after the performance I had to pull up the script and read what the ending was as written because it doesn't match what Gold has put on stage. I lost all the beauty in the final moments that I was waiting for. I'd consider seeing it again if I got front row rush to see if it improves my experience. I'm glad I saw it, but more so glad I saw it through TDF. If I had payed full price I would have been disappointed.

When I first read this, I interpreted the scene where Jim breaks the unicorn very differently.

To me, the unicorn represented Laura, who always felt different (much like the unicorn was different from the other glass animals). But when the horn broke off, Laura mentioned that it was now like all the others (something like that). Dancing with Jim made her, too, feel "normal" for the first time in her life.

More optimistic than Laura and the unicorn just getting "shattered," I guess.

Meh...SALLY FIELD is a talent and I enjoyed FINN WITTROCK... but... there were too many artistic choices that did not match the size or power of the BELASCO THEATER...I don't know what SAM GOLD was thinking (the lights staying on for what felt like 30 minutes? Ughhhh)

The show got better with time but I also left feeling very underwhelmed...poor staging, direction and a lack of set will do that to a show like this...One of the great disappointments of the season... but SALLY FIELD was excellent. So, cool, I guess?

As a huge fan of the John Tiffany revival, I was thoroughly disappointed and unimpressed by this. The cast had no chemistry. Sally wasn't big enough-- a subtle Amanda Wingfield is not what the text calls for. And agreed on the ridiculous pink dress.

And why was Madison crawling all over the floor? It was exploitative.



The design did not make any sense. Too bad.

Updated On: 2/21/17 at 09:29 AM

I rushed this play yesterday- front row, center. I was fourth in line at 9:30 and it was just us four until the box office opened at 10am so as of right now it's an easy rush.

Like others, this was my first time seeing The Glass Menagerie on stage and I thought it was ok. It was worth the rush, didn't mind the lack of an intermission and loved the leg room in the first row. It took a moment to adjust to Mantello's Tom and although Sally Field was charming it didn't read Amanda for me. Finn was fine and I agree 100% with Whizzer regarding Madison's Laura.

I second ColorTheHours.

My boyfriend and I saw this on Thursday. We loved it. We were over the moon for the Tiffany production but after seeing Gold's version, Tiffany's almost seems cartoonish.

Fields is giving a very realistic interpretation of Amanda - a women who starts the play at the end of her rope. The only time she puts on any sort of Southern facade is when the Gentleman Caller comes in. Otherwise, she's not pretending to be anyone other than who she is because she simply doesn't have the time or the energy to perform something else. She is doing all she can to hold it together and may break at any moment. It made the desperation of her character palpable. Whereas with other interpretations of Amanda the audience is left thinking they'll survive. Here, you're left thinking that she's not going to make it right from the start but she can't admit to herself how truly screwed she is.

I did not find Ferris' handicap exploitative at all. I also think it works fine with the text. Does Amanda say it's barely noticeable? Yes. And this further emphasizes how out of touch she is with reality. To borrow from ColorTheHours, she was the "other" in the room. It was an unexpected portrayal that I never would have envisioned. I can see why it wouldn't work for some. It worked perfectly for me.

Mantello was great. His age actually enhanced the role for me. I can't put my finger on it. It made more sense to have an older man looking back on all of this. Mantello also has such an easy command of the stage. He grounds the poetic language so well.

Wittrock is giving a very literal interpretation of the Gentleman Caller. While true to the text, I almost wish he had been more romanticized. I kept thinking that if Finn Wittrock showed up at this girl's door with flowers it would be easy to see how her breath would be taken away!

The set design and lighting were typical Gold/Van Hove. I thought they worked to great effect (Why is no one talking about the great and super subtle effect of the moving table! How Brilliant!). The rain and the lighting during the Gentleman Caller scene made for such a velvety, Southern feel.

My only criticism is that I do think this should have played off-Broadway. The audience on the night I was there was not expecting something so abstract. I could see a lot of tourists, Jersey and Long Islanders who had come to see Sally Field and left during the show wondering what the hell they were watching. Having folks leave during the middle of a scene is rough on everyone. But I can see how someone who is not engaged could feel like the show was neverending. Putting this up at The Public, St. Ann's, BAM or NYTW would have made a bit more sense to me and may have given this a more intimate feel to an already intimate production.

Overall, a great interpretation of one of America's finest plays. Hats off to all involved.

There was one early message on here saying that the balcony seats are pretty terrible for this and effectively all partial view. I wanted to ask if anyone else has sat up there and can chime in. I've seen so many production of The Glass Menagerie and word of mouth is so mixed on this one that I'm wary of spending top dollar to see it, but at the same time, shelling out thirty extra dollars for the rear mezz if the balcony is really atrocious might be worth it. So...any thoughts on seating for this particular production would be most helpful and most appreciated.

Sauja, if you're eligible for LincTix, those are in the rear mezz and they're fine. It's a little difficult to adjust at first during the Gentleman Caller/Laura scene since it's played in only candlelight, but they're good seats for the price.

I have a window card for the show that I bought from Triton that I would love to get signed. Are they strict about only having playbills signed at the stage door? Thanks so much for all your help!