Very much in agreement with Fenchurch's first post. Now keep in mind, I personally think this particular sequel idea would suck. Not because I think Andrew Lloyd Webber is a hack, and certainly not because I spit upon the original as so many show queens get off doing, but because of the ideas we've already seen thrown around for this
Phantom sequel...they've just been bad. However, if you're going to outright damn this sequel just because it's a sequel, remember that there are indeed plenty of examples of successful sequels in the history of theatre and opera like the ones Fenchurch mentioned. If someone considers a sequel for a modern musical like
Phantom, they are not necessarily heralding in the death of musical theatre (and spare me the comments about the original
Phantom having already done the job).
In any case, I really doubt Lloyd Webber will actually go through with this. I'm not sure he's of perfectly sound mind, but I still think he'll have to realize eventually that this project wouldn't contribute much to the legacy of
Phantom.
"If there is going to be a restoration fee, there should also be a Renaissance fee, a Middle Ages fee and a Dark Ages fee. Someone must have men in the back room making up names, euphemisms for profit."
(Emanuel Azenberg)
Updated On: 2/16/07 at 05:44 PM