SmokeyLady said: "Jarethan said: "I guess that I have to be a contrarian. I thought this was thoroughly mediocre from start to finish. I think there were three reasons this did good business: Neil Simon, when he was still relevant; Marvin Hamlisch; and Lucille Ball. I say Lucille because people saw Lucie grow up and, despite no real credentials, she sold tickets. I imagine Richard Klein sold tickets…he was the best thing about this show. Lucie was also very good. But it was just tired, would be painfully dated by now, and had about two good songs.
i will admit that I saw this AFTER seeing Sweeney Todd for the first time, so that may have had some impact on my assessment. It was trivial.
i sound like I have contempt for it, which is not the case. It was the type of show where I summarized it to friends as ‘if you did not see it, you didn’t miss anything’, and it is definitely not worth dealing with the Lincoln Tunnel on Saturday night (which I had actually done)."
That is cool Not every show is for everyone. I do have a place in my heart for both shows mentioned. I would love to see them back. I saw Song a few times during its run. Lucie and Robert were the best. I also enjoyed Diana Canova. Anyone remeber her? I also saw Victor Garber and Lorna Luft on tour."
But wouldn’t you think it was really dated, as so much Neil Simon has?