Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

Tonys "Hamilton" Might Not Win — Page 2

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#26

Tonys

The Distinctive Baritone said: "Technically, the only "lead" character in Hamilton is Hamilton. They clearly petitioned Odom and Soo for leading so there'd be more room for nominations in the featured categories. I imagine they did the same thing with the original Les Miz, which is why Terrance Mann got nominated as "leading."

I didn't think there was any question that Burr was a leading character. As far as stage time, number of songs and impact on the show, Burr has a very, very significant presence in the show. If you compared Burr to the the characters in the show deemed "featured" it is apples to oranges.


I like a good rhyme more than a good time
#27

Tonys

Oh man, I WISH Jeff Probst was a Tony voter.

#28

Tonys

I think Javert and Burr are definitely both lead characters in Les Miz and Hamilton. I'm not sure why you think they were petitioned for political purposes.


"Contentment, it seems, simply happens. It appears accompanied by no bravos and no tears."
#29

Tonys

I agree that it would be odd to have Burr going against King George in featured, since King George is onstage for what...maybe seven minutes in the entire play? (That must be a record for shortest stage time to result in a Tony nomination).

It's such a complicated issue I created a new thread about it.

#30

Tonys

The whole point of Burr's character in Hamilton is that he's there throughout and the show highlights their similarities (Dear Theodosia) and differences (Wait For It). Burr is literally the first person Hamilton meets in the show and the last person he sees too. I can understand (but strongly disagree with) the idea that Phillipa should be in featured but it would be ridiculous IMO to have Leslie in featured.

#31

Tonys

The Distinctive Baritone said: "I have a feeling that Danny Burstein will win for Fiddler as sort of a "yeah we should probably finally give him one" sort of thing.

Plus, I would find it very strange for the guy playing Burr to win over the guy playing Hamilton. That's like Javert beating Jean Valjean to a best leading actor award. Technically, the only "lead" character in Hamilton is Hamilton. They clearly petitioned Odom and Soo for leading so there'd be more room for nominations in the featured categories. I imagine they did the same thing with the original Les Miz, which is why Terrance Mann got nominated as "leading."




"

Except Burr IS actually a leading character. The story is essentially framed by his telling of it and acts as a constant counterpoint to Hamilton. He is also given nearly equal character insight (I say character insight because Hamilton is expanded upon further through historical insight) and equally strong wants and motivations. Very much a leading performance. Phillipa Soo was petitioned as a lead to basically give the award to Renèe and reduce the risk of split votes.

The only award I see it definitely losing is Lead Actress (as lovely as Phillipa is). Confused as to why so many people are predicting it will lose any design awards. It's not about who built the most complex, intricate set or lighting design (though anyone who thinks Hamilton's design is "simple" is severely misguided); it should be about how it services the production and enhances it. In that sense, Hamilton has it all in the bag. Not since Matilda have I seen a production on Broadway designed so closely in tandem with direction and writing as to render them indistinguishable from each other.

#32

Tonys

ChildofEarth said: "I think Leslie is a lead through and through. Aaron Burr is the show, in my opinion - maybe once casting changes I will change my mind.


People keep saying that, but I just don't see it. He disappears for long stretches of the show, especially in the second act, and I never felt like the show was about him the way it's about Hamilton. Without Burr, there'd still be a story. Without Hamilton, there wouldn't.



#33

Tonys

hork said: "Without Burr, there'd still be a story. Without Hamilton, there wouldn't."

You can't tell Alexander Hamilton's story without including Aaron Burr. Burr is the first name most people associate with Hamilton.

#34

Tonys

The only award I see it definitely losing is Lead Actress (as lovely as Phillipa is). Confused as to why so many people are predicting it will lose any design awards. It's not about who built the most complex, intricate set or lighting design (though anyone who thinks Hamilton's design is "simple" is severely misguided); it should be about how it services the production and enhances it. In that sense, Hamilton has it all in the bag. Not since Matilda have I seen a production on Broadway designed so closely in tandem with direction and writing as to render them indistinguishable from each other.



"

I don't think anyone's arguing that Hamilton's going to lose set or lighting because the other shows had more- it's because the other shows design elements helped the show more. American Psycho's lighting was one of the reasons that show worked for me, and She Loves Me's set got entrance applause the night I saw it and made you feel like you were part of the shop. Of all the nominees, I thought Hamilton's lighting was a bit overdone and made it hard to focus at points.

#35

Tonys

Out of curiosity, why do some people think Phillipa Soo won't win?

#36

Tonys

It doesn't matter how big or small the role is. It isn't Best Actor in a Leading Role. The category is for the actor (as in Leading Actor or Featured Actor) and is determined by billing (or petition from the producers). If the producers petitioned for Odom as leading and the committee accepts, then he's a Leading Actor. That's it.


"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
#37

Tonys

My question is: If Hamilton didn't exist what show would be the front runner for Best Musical?


Use my code "YZTFG" for $20 OFF tickets on TodayTix!
#38

Tonys

Petrichor said: "Out of curiosity, why do some people think Phillipa Soo won't win? "

She has much less stage time than the rest of the nominees in her category and when she is on stage, she is giving a very nuanced and subtle performance (on purpose and to her credit) in comparison to, for example, Cynthia Erivo, who is delivering a showstopper of a performance. Her type of performance is easier to overlook. I don't think she will win but I also don't think it would be 'the most shocking Tony win ever' if she did win as some people have claimed. The fact she got in over Audra McDonald in the first place already says a lot about how voters are viewing her performance. (Same with Carmen Cusack).

#39

Tonys

Petrichor said: "Out of curiosity, why do some people think Phillipa Soo won't win?"

Two words: Cynthia. Erivo.

But, honestly - compared to the other women in the category, Phillipa's performance [while wonderful] doesn't stack up as high. Cynthia is living every moment as Celie, Jessie Mueller captures every heartbreaking moment of Jenna, Carmen Cusack is making a sublime Broadway debut, and Laura Benanti is playing a role that may as well have been written for her level of perfection. Phillipa does a wonderful job, but the competition here is just very much on another level.

I second the motion that Featured Actor in a Musical is Christopher Fitzgerald's to lose. It'll be similar to last year when the women of Fun Home split the category and Ruthie Ann Miles slipped in there and won.


"Anybody that goes to the theater, I think we’re all misfits, so we ended up on stage or in the audience.” --- Patti LuPone.

Updated On: 5/9/16 at 05:30 PM

#40

Tonys

ClumsyDude15 said: "Petrichor said: "Out of curiosity, why do some people think Phillipa Soo won't win?"

Two words: Cynthia. Erivo.

But, honestly - compared to the other women in the category, Phillipa's performance [while wonderful] doesn't stack up as high. Cynthia is living every moment as Celie, Jessie Mueller captures every heartbreaking moment of Jenna, Carmen Cusack is making a sublime Broadway debut, and Laura Benanti is playing a role that may as well have been written for her level of perfection. Phillipa does a wonderful job, but the competition here is just very much on another level.

I second the motion that Featured Actor in a Musical is Christopher Fitzgerald's to lose. It'll be similar to last year when the women of Fun Home split the category and Ruthie Ann Miles slipped in there and won.




"

Hm, fair enough. Unfortunately, I have not yet had the opportunity to see any of them perform live, so I can't really form a solid opinion on who I think should win. That is a very tough choice, though. If only all of these talented ladies could take home awards.

#41

Tonys

ZellMorrowsPledge said: "My question is: If Hamilton didn't exist what show would be the front runner for Best Musical?"

My guess would be a tight race between "Bright Star" and "Waitress", I think.


They/them. "Get up the nerve to be all you deserve to be."
#42

Tonys

ZellMorrowsPledge said: "My question is: If Hamilton didn't exist what show would be the front runner for Best Musical?



"

Either Waitress or Shuffle Along, I think, though I'd give the edge to Shuffle Along, as much as I loved both.

#43

Tonys

If Ebersole could win for 42nd Street, there is more than enough hope for Soo. There's no hard and fast rule regarding size or showiness if the role.


"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
#44

Tonys

ZellMorrowsPledge said: "My question is: If Hamilton didn't exist what show would be the front runner for Best Musical?"

Shuffle Along or Waitress. Waitress would have a great shot at Best Score as well and possibly could have snagged a set design nod.


I like a good rhyme more than a good time
#45

Tonys

Mister Matt said: "It doesn't matter how big or small the role is. It isn't Best Actor in a Leading Role. The category is for the actor (as in Leading Actor or Featured Actor) and is determined by billing (or petition from the producers). If the producers petitioned for Odom as leading and the committee accepts, then he's a Leading Actor. That's it."

I think actually the title of the award is "Best Performance by an Actor/Actress in a Leading/Featured Role in a Musical/Play." so it seems like it really should depend on if the role is leading.


"Contentment, it seems, simply happens. It appears accompanied by no bravos and no tears."
#46

Tonys

I think it is a long shot for Best Revival.

#47

Tonys

Burr's role in Hamilton reminds me of Judas' role in Jesus Christ Superstar, and Salieri's role in Amadeus. The story about the main character is told through the antagonist's eyes (I think Miranda mentions this in the Hamiltome). Now you'd say that Amadeus is about Mozart, but Salieri is the main character. He's the one telling the story. Burr is telling the story of Hamilton, and his own story too. They're both leads. (in fact for the film version of Amadeus F. Murray Abraham and Tom Hulce were both nominated for Oscars for lead actor in a movie. Abraham won.).

#48

Tonys

ZellMorrowsPledge said: "My question is: If Hamilton didn't exist what show would be the front runner for Best Musical?"

In your fictional world, what is currently at the Richard Rodgers? Hard to answer without knowing that, as well...

#49

Tonys

The same thing happened with Ian McKellen and Tim Curry when the play opened on Broadway.


"Contentment, it seems, simply happens. It appears accompanied by no bravos and no tears."
#50

Tonys

dramamama611 said: "CindersGolightly said: " Who knows, though. I mean, Jonathan Groff got nominated just to break a record, so maybe they'll tie the vote to make two actors win, upping their total win count. Tonys are about money and exposure, not art."



Really? You think Groff was nominated just to break a record? or that over 800 voters will conspire to "up" Hamilton's count? If they are about "money and exposure" then wouldn't they want someone else to win...so they too could make some bank?




"

The size of the nomination committee is only around 50 fyi.

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $106
Hot Show
Tickets From $60