Sooooooooooooo bad... that it's good? I think this might fall under that category, though my partner disagrees. He just thought it was terrible.
There is a certain level of camp here that is almost unattainable by the highest level of Queen because the cast and creatives aren't in on the joke. The audience around me was laughing throughout the show but knowing that it wasn't supposed to be funny we all had to hold in our laughs. At one point a singer comes into the audience with a spotlight, but it was brutally awkward because people who were sneaking out got caught in the spotlight and the entire audience laughed.
Laurie Wells and Dionne Figgins were both outstanding. If Laurie Wells does a solo show at 54 Below it would be well worth going cause her voice is stunning... too bad that the schlock she was given made the audience break out into laughter every time one of her songs came on.
The audience had to fake clap after most numbers and refused to clap at all several times. They should cut the intermission cause half the audience left... also trying to give a plot to a bunch of songs that are unrelated, without having an actual book, just made the thing that much worse. When the lead character's husband dies in Vietnam she breaks out into a dance filled rendition of DOWNTOWN... because after all, when you are down and life is making you lonely you can always go downtown....
Still this thing oozes sex sex sex. The chorus boys were so hot, as were all the girls in thongs. This thing could actually sell well to the older crowd based on the nude painting scene alone.
I DEFINITELY recommend this show to anyone and everyone who loves SO BAD IT'S GOOD theatre and really effing sexy chorus boys that are more than half naked throughout the show. This thing was just unbelievably awful. I just can't understand how they made the decisions that led them down this road to NYC. Hats off to the tremendous cast for giving it their all.