ctorres23 said: "So, a little vague on how long he will be stepping back.
I don't see how it could not be vague. The sort of therapy he needs will likely take years. Before he can return, he will need redemption, something I believe in by the way.
In the short term I imagine there won't be much impact on existing productions that he's financed, but I do wonder if this will have longer-term consequences and if he will produce fewer shows, perhaps focusing more on film.
First of all, he has not financed these shows, he has produced them. This is going to have long term consequences, as I explained above. This is not just a quick suspension. By the terms of what he said, this applies to theatre and not film but "we shall see" seems the operative posture. Note also that Ms. Siegel is a film person, not a theatre person, and that his office was not bifurcated, so it is not unimaginable that there will be more forthcoming depending on how he proceeds. At his age, I think it is possible he may just slow down, bearing in mind that for him, operating at 10% of his previous pace would be closer to "normal." Thos 5AM phone calls were real.
My main concern here is that Broadway was already becoming corporatized and I feel pushing out (even if justifiably) one of the more interesting independent producers will just hasten its transition to an all-Disney medium. There are of course more independent producers that will surely backfill the openings but it's hard to deny his consistent contributions.
I don't think corporations will fill Rudin's void, which rarely if ever strayed into the territory of interest to corporations. His absence will be felt for sure though.
But also, it will be fine. It's always fine."
Of course.