Nailed. About the last thing Broadway audiences demand: another show with straight men in drag. I'm sure it's filled with expertise and craft, fine work all around, but there's no box office star, and nothing about the iteration -- of a movie that came out in boomer childhoods -- suggests must-see. Interestingly enough, Sugar*, which I saw in my youth, had Tony Roberts, Robert Morse, and Cyril Ritchard. That trio, all B'way stars of a sort, plus Jule Styne, made it an event. Yet it failed. I'm not suggesting failure here, just voicing zero surprise that it's not necessarily booking well.
*By the way, the 1972 Time review of Sugar. Quite a comment on then and now, no?
"Sugar is almost a textbook case of a musical born after its time. It may well enjoy great wads of audience favor. But in the past three years, Company and Follies have altered the critical perspective by providing a musical form that is spare, intelligent, ironic, mature and capable of sustaining three-dimensional characters." He concluded, "This is not to say that the big, old-fashioned musical is irrevocably doomed, but it must have a singular mood, manner and meaning all its own. Otherwise, all that remains, as Sugar indicates, is a sterile display of high-gloss techniques..."
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 10/19/22 at 11:54 AM