Thanks, Fosse....it underscores my belief that the higher ticket pries aren't just a financial deterrent. For $125 (or more) audiences expect - demand - elaborate scenerey, which I think is limiting.
One of my all-time favourite shows was the original production of GRAND HOTEL - The Musical. And even then, with the top price around $50 then there was grumbling - and a FORBIDDEN BROADWAY parody. ("What kind of hotel is this? There are no walls in my room. Only a row of chairs.") If they revived GRAND HOTEL with its original design and staging (Oh god I wish!)would audiences balk at paying $125 for a show with virtually no set?
Are we are also spoon-feeding audiences, raised on movies, who expect every scene to be furnished down to the smallest detail.
Years ago Hal Prince gave a talk where he explained that one of his favourite sets is a table and 2 chairs. With that you can be anywhere: A street cafe in Paris, a busy restaurant, a tenement kitchen. All done in collaboration with the performers and the audience filling in the details.
As I have said in the past, my litmus test for the quality of any show is to determine how well it would work with a minimalist staging: The shows that work in that environment are the ones with strong writing. Massive sets and special effects just act as camouflage.
We are losing that vital element of imagination that allows a theatre audience to suspend disbelief and buy into a stage illusion.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com