VintageSnarker said: "Stephen Sondheim."
I have little doubt that Miranda will be prolific (like Sondheim), and that makes me happy. I think that Miranda is in a position though, that's unlike any other creative in musical theater history because of what's happened with Hamilton. So far, Miranda is incomparable.
The show has won every award possible (including the Pulitzer). In terms of "most Tonys", the only show that has surpassed his is The Producers. Mel Brooks has yet to equal his own success (although, to be fair, Brooks' primary focus has always been comedy, not writing scores for musical theater).
Other musical theater creatives have been awarded like Miranda, but not to the extent of winning almost everything possible, in a single season, for one show. Beyond the awards, Hamilton did something no musical has ever done. It influenced a tangible part of American history, or at least temporarily stayed the course. When you look at a $10 bill, you will not see the face of Harriet Tubman because of the musical Hamilton. That influence, as well as the intangible influences and results of re-designing the physical faces of American historical figures, is what makes Miranda and Hamilton incomparable to my mind.
Beyond being prolific (which is hopefully a given), what direction can any creative go after all that, and what effect will it have on how anything he writes in the future will be viewed? It's interesting for me to read the opinions regarding 'another historical show' and even the humorous reference to Evita because those are thoughts that cross my mind, too.
Updated On: 6/13/16 at 09:24 AM