All kidding aside, I love the Eiz and have a tremendous amount of respect for his knowledge of the theater, which puts mine to shame. His reviews are extremely intelligent and well written. But having said that, I do wonder why he writes his reviews based on the first (or a very early) preview, and then does not go back and write a second review of the show once it's frozen. I am not entirely sure what the point is of his thoughtful reviews, as articulate as they are. If it is to influence others as to whether a show might be worth the investment of time and money, then I ask whether or not that's entirely fair. How many authors or composers would like someone to review their first drafts?
I understand that this is Wizzer's trademark, so to speak. But he is such a talented critic, at least in my view, that I wish that he would write reviews based on the show that opens, at least as a follow up. If he did, I'd certainly pay more attention to his ultimate opinions. Yes, The Wiz has carved out a nitch for himself here, but I'd hope he'd trust his own ability enough to engage in serious criticism. I know I trust his ability, but I just have trouble taking anyone's reviews of first previews seriously.
CZJ at opening night party for A Little Night Music, Dec 13, 2009.