"TO LOVE ANOTHER PERSON IS TO SEE THE FACE OF GOD"- LES MISERABLES---
"THERE'S A SPECIAL KIND OF PEOPLE KNOWN AS SHOW PEOPLE... WE'RE BORN EVERY NIGHT AT HALF HOUR CALL!"--- CURTAINS
that's EXACTLY how 'young frankenstein' started. hardly ran a year.
not saying that 'addams family' is gonna die, just saying a good time during previews doesn't mean a sure fire hit.
"the stage too must experiment - with ideas, with the psychological relationship of men and women, with speech and rhythm forms, with dance and movement, with color and light - or it must and should become a museum product. in an age of terrific implications as to wealth and poverty, as to the function of government, as to peace and war, as to the relation of the artist to all these forces, the theatre must grow up. the theatre must become conscious of the implications of the changing social order, or the changing social older will ignore, and rightly, the implications of the theatre." - hallie flanagan, director of the federal theatre project
*blame e.e. mings*
Wow. Impressive start. I am a fan, so I am glad to see this number. Plus commercial shows tend to attract tourists who usually see more than one show, which is a big help to the smaller shows with less advertising budget (Next Fall, Sondheim on Sondheim etc), so I am glad all the way around.
I agree with the statement that no one can know now how ADDAMS will ultimately fair. Could be a "Wicked", could be a "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels", could be a "Dance of the Vampires. Most likely, somewhere in between two of those three shows -- which two depends on what you think of the show.
But since so many seem to be in a rush to compare it to "Young Frankenstein" -- and, despite The Addams Family's flaws as a show, I don't find the comparison apt developmentally, artistically or qualitatively -- I wonder how it can be said so emphatically that this is "EXACTLY" how "Young Frankenstein" started when, as others have posted, part of YF's hubris was that they did not report their grosses to Variety at all.
"No matter how much you want the part, never let 'em see you sweat." -- Old Dry Idea commercial
i wasn't comparing 'af' and 'yf', as you put it, developmentally, artistically or qualitatively; merely in attendance, or rather, quantitatively. as for 'yf' numbers, i work in the industry, i know a few people who worked on the 'yf'. as anyone can gather, it sold VERY well during previews.
"the stage too must experiment - with ideas, with the psychological relationship of men and women, with speech and rhythm forms, with dance and movement, with color and light - or it must and should become a museum product. in an age of terrific implications as to wealth and poverty, as to the function of government, as to peace and war, as to the relation of the artist to all these forces, the theatre must grow up. the theatre must become conscious of the implications of the changing social order, or the changing social older will ignore, and rightly, the implications of the theatre." - hallie flanagan, director of the federal theatre project
*blame e.e. mings*
well, they could always make the entire orchestra section premium setting. The Producers did that during Lane & Broderick's return. And they could make the entire rear mezz. $91. There's always a way to increase ticket prices. And as long as this show gets somewhat decent reviews, I'd expect it to turn into a top seller this year. It'll be interesting in the next couple weeks how it does at 8 shows a week and if it could possibly top Wicked.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
yes, 14 months, that two months more than a year or, in other words, hardly a year. is there something wrong with that wording? i guess i should have put 14 months? or maybe you would prefer, "that's EXACTLY how 'young frankenstein' started. it only ran 29 previews, staring on 10/11/2007, and 485 performances, having opened on 11/8/07 and closing on 12/4/09."
better??
"the stage too must experiment - with ideas, with the psychological relationship of men and women, with speech and rhythm forms, with dance and movement, with color and light - or it must and should become a museum product. in an age of terrific implications as to wealth and poverty, as to the function of government, as to peace and war, as to the relation of the artist to all these forces, the theatre must grow up. the theatre must become conscious of the implications of the changing social order, or the changing social older will ignore, and rightly, the implications of the theatre." - hallie flanagan, director of the federal theatre project
*blame e.e. mings*
I find it very unlikely that this will beat Wicked in grosses. Many shows have come very close, but I doubt Addams Family will do so. If so, that'd be fantastic! But right now, it seems to be doing a great job! Hope the grosses stay!
Shows:
Wicked 9.20.08; Wicked 3.14.09; Wicked 4.11.09; Cats 10.27.09; Legally Blonde 11.25.09; Chicago 11.27.09; Wicked 11.27.09; The Color Purple 12.1.09; Wicked 3.25.10; Wicked 3.26.10; Wicked 3.27.10; Wicked 3.28.10; Wicked 4.2.10; Wicked 4.3.10 (Evening and Matinee); Wicked 4.9.10; Wicked 4.10.10; Wicked 4.11.10; The Color Purple 4.24.10;
"Hardly a year" implies it did not run a full year. He was merely pointing out that it ran two months longer than that. Hardly something to get all bitchy about.
oh jebus, this is ridiculous. mark, remind me to change my password tomorrow. seriously.
"the stage too must experiment - with ideas, with the psychological relationship of men and women, with speech and rhythm forms, with dance and movement, with color and light - or it must and should become a museum product. in an age of terrific implications as to wealth and poverty, as to the function of government, as to peace and war, as to the relation of the artist to all these forces, the theatre must grow up. the theatre must become conscious of the implications of the changing social order, or the changing social older will ignore, and rightly, the implications of the theatre." - hallie flanagan, director of the federal theatre project
*blame e.e. mings*
I wouldn't expect to see "Addams" beat "Wicked" anytime soon. Purely based on capacity, the Lunt has almost 300 fewer seats than the Gershwin (representing $200-250K or more in gross potential). Even with boffo premium seat business and a higher price scale, it would take a real "off" week from "Wicked" for "Addams" to knock it from its #1 perch.
"No matter how much you want the part, never let 'em see you sweat." -- Old Dry Idea commercial
>>>"Hardly a year" implies it did not run a full year.<<
Huh? Are we no longer using English as the official language here?
I could hardly lift it means you couldn't lift it? It was hardly alive means it was dead -- not alive? I could hardly hear the music means the music couldn't be heard?
we pick the most petty things to debate on these boards. that being said, "hardly a year" means just over a year, "almost a year" would be less than a year.
14 months is "hardly a year," thank you.
it's very doubtful it will surpass wicked in gross merely for the fact that the Gershwin has about 300 more seats then the L-F. unless the jack those prices up (doubtful), it wont surpass.
Addams will be golden thru the summer, based on the advance it has, what happens after that is up to the theatre gods.
How much of an advance does it have and how do you come to know (it seems to be quite the guarded secret, save for Flahooley2's "friend in the press office")?
Not intentionally being snarky -- as a fan of the show (one of the few it seems on BWW), I'm legitimately interested to know both how well it's sold thus far and how much faith to put in the information.
"No matter how much you want the part, never let 'em see you sweat." -- Old Dry Idea commercial