Swing Joined: 4/14/09
This idea was brought up on another thread, "What two theatres would you want to own on Broadway" (mine the Imperial); however, I found a side topic quite interesting and deserving of its own. Member, fingerlakessinger, suggested one of the theatres be used for national tours.
I can't believe this idea has never been thought of, but I think it is a great one. There was of course the question of profitability for a show that maybe recently closed on Broadway (they usually do so for a reason), but I think it could work. Someone suggested the Marquis (many reasons). That is a great option as it has Times Square (tourist) appeal. Obviously you would not want to put a tour in that has a company on Broadway. However, a suggestion was to have the national tours of blockbusters like Wicked or Lion King perform in a secondary house for the Christmas season to meet demand. Both great ideas and I'm sure there may be equity rules etc.
All of these shows would be for a limited run of say 2 weeks to 3 months.
I don't know if the powers that be or investors look at these boards, but something to discuss. Any thoughts?
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/13/09
People talk about the money that could be made by Wicked or Lion King coming in for the holidays with out thinking about the fact that Broadway theatres typically have a much smaller seating capacity than the road houses that these companies are currently playing. As a producer I would rather try to sell out a 2500-5000 seat theatre; much greater potential gross on the road than there is on Broadway.
What, so they'd have TWO Wicked productions??
RE: This idea, cf. HAIR coming back to broadway: discount code of $50 per seat. I don't know if it's a good idea.
I like the idea of shows that are on tour, but not currently open on Broadway, coming through, especially since it seems like most tours don't come anywhere near the NY area.
I don't think it's necessary for there to be two productions of any show running in the same area though...way too complicated.
Broadway Star Joined: 7/26/07
You also have to remember that the official list of "Broadway" theatres is maintained by the TONY administrators. If this were to happen, they could easily just disqualify the theatre, and for good reason.
Les Miz did this once in London by having the tour play the Barbican and the sit-down London production play the Queens. (Hence, the three casts at the 25th anniversary concert.)
Stand-by Joined: 6/2/08
Wait, you lost me. Why is this a "great" idea?
I think its an interesting idea. For example, a few years ago Camelot toured with Rachel York. I would have loved to have seen it, but it never came near where I lived. Had it played New York City, I would have had a chance.
Even a show that had closed in recent years could probably do well for 1-2 weeks on Broadway. I can almost guarantee that if the 1st national tour of Spring Awakening came back for two weeks it would do incredible, due to the star power Lea Michele and Jon Groff have now brought to it.
Wait, so all y'all are saying that (even though it just closed in January) if "Next To Normal" had wrapped up its tour by playing 3-4 weeks in New York with Alice Ripley that there would be zero interest? I didn't think so.
I definitely think touring productions coming to New York is at least something to consider. If done at the right time, there'd be an interest.
What about a place like NY City Center? I may be wrong, and I can't check now since it's closed for renovations I believe, but isn't that house often close for weeks at a time off-season? Couldn't tours play that house for a few weeks to a month a few times a year?
The 90's tour of Grease played City Center for a week or two around Christmas while the Broadway production was still playing.
Videos