As far as I'm concerned, it's more important that Zachary Quinto started a discussion than it is that he misused the word "recreational" and expressed some common misassumptions about gay men younger than he is.
I just hated the pile-on that hit him on the Internet--especially when his statement mirrored what so many gay men initially thought about PrEP or still do. That kind of scolding is worse than the scolding Zach was accused of, because it only serves to shut down discussion.
What Zach did that very few have done--or even CAN do--was bring the debate about PrEP to his several million movie fans, his million+ Twitter followers, his 600,000+ FB fans and his 400,000+ Instagram followers--many of whom undoubtedly will think about PrEP for the first time.
Maybe instead of calling him names, we should say "Thanks for bringing this up, Zach. Here are some things you might not know."
Peter Staley said: "You can count on one hand the number of times a young, openly gay Hollywood actor has talked about HIV/AIDS in the last decade. In fact, you'd probably only need a couple of fingers. Zachary Quinto just boldly went where few gay thirty-somethings have gone before, talking passionately about how HIV is affecting his community, and he's getting dumped on for straying from the HIV/AIDS party line. I want to thank him for being one of the few that gives a ****, and for speaking out about gay men and HIV."
And Michelangelo Signorile agreed with Peter Staley on the difference between scolding Zach and schooling him:
"Let's encourage more public figures to speak about HIV prevention, period. And yeah, when they don't get it right, let's have a dialogue about it.... I just want to encourage more discussion among public figures, and yes, let's correct them when they're wrong. i think Peter's initial point about so few public speaking on this was right and we don't want their publicists saying don't talk about this at all because it just gets you in trouble."
Updated On: 11/16/14 at 07:38 AM