Michelle is One Hungry Gal — Page 3
#53
Posted: 10/25/08 at 9:28am
Art has a double face, of expression and illusion.
#54
Posted: 10/25/08 at 10:33am
I never said it was real. That other one is definitely a fake. That's not even my screen name!
You're not that stupid backward B girl, are you?
You're not that stupid backward B girl, are you?
Updated On: 10/25/08 at 10:33 AM
#55
Posted: 10/25/08 at 10:43am
I doubt that that check is real.
Obama/Biden 08
#56
Posted: 10/25/08 at 6:15pm
It isn't. You can tell just by looking at it. Even if you ignore the fact that she was in Indiana at the time, you can see that the signature on both lines is exactly the same.
Updated On: 10/25/08 at 06:15 PM
#57
Posted: 10/25/08 at 6:17pm
The Check IS NOT real. She DID NOT stay at the Waldorf Astoria. She DID NOT order $447 worth of Lobster. This is ridiculous.
#58
Posted: 10/25/08 at 7:31pm
I find it strange that anyone would be concerned with whether she did or didn't order it. Who cares? What possible difference does it make to anything?
Updated On: 10/25/08 at 07:31 PM
#60
Posted: 10/26/08 at 8:58am
See there is something called "The Truth." Some people respect that, search for it, even die for it. People spend their life digging up fossils to try to prove what happened millions of years ago. Others interview witnesses and examine evidence to see if someone is guilty of a crime.
While this case is certainly not an earthshaking one, when you say "Oh yeah, I'm sure that uppity elitist ordered all that food, it totally sounds like something she'd do" and disregard all the actual facts it diminishes us all. And it also makes it easier to disregard facts all together and to believe things like the world being 4000 years old and dinosaurs and man co-exisiting, or that Sarah Palin was cleared of all wrong doing by that investigation in Alaska.
While this case is certainly not an earthshaking one, when you say "Oh yeah, I'm sure that uppity elitist ordered all that food, it totally sounds like something she'd do" and disregard all the actual facts it diminishes us all. And it also makes it easier to disregard facts all together and to believe things like the world being 4000 years old and dinosaurs and man co-exisiting, or that Sarah Palin was cleared of all wrong doing by that investigation in Alaska.
#62
Posted: 10/26/08 at 9:18am
Sounds like an elite employee of The Waldorf.
or that Sarah Palin was cleared of all wrong doing by that investigation in Alaska
She was cleared of all wrong-doing. She broke no laws. Everything she did was within her rights as a governor. Anything else is just opinion. You would think someone who is so obsessed with the "truth" would know that.
or that Sarah Palin was cleared of all wrong doing by that investigation in Alaska
She was cleared of all wrong-doing. She broke no laws. Everything she did was within her rights as a governor. Anything else is just opinion. You would think someone who is so obsessed with the "truth" would know that.
Updated On: 10/26/08 at 09:18 AM
#63
Posted: 10/26/08 at 11:18am
JohnnyBoyII said: "Everything she did was within her rights as a governor."
The investigative committee said:
FINDING ONE
Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. That states: "Each public officer holds office as a public trust and any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest though official action is a violation of that trust."
* The most damaging finding. Stephen Branchflower, the investigator appointed by Alaska legislators, concluded that the Governor abused her power by conducting a campaign to have her former brother-in-law Mike Wooten fired as a state trooper, or by failing to prevent her husband Todd from doing so. He deemed this an effort to secure "a personal interest" under the Ethics Act, through her position.
She was within her rights to fire Walt Monaghan.
BUT, she was not within her rights to put pressure, and knowingly allow her husband to put pressure, on her subordinates in an effort to get Officer Wooten fired. Two different issues. Two different findings. Really, how hard is that for you, Sarah and the rest of her talking heads to grasp?
The investigative committee said:
FINDING ONE
Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. That states: "Each public officer holds office as a public trust and any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest though official action is a violation of that trust."
* The most damaging finding. Stephen Branchflower, the investigator appointed by Alaska legislators, concluded that the Governor abused her power by conducting a campaign to have her former brother-in-law Mike Wooten fired as a state trooper, or by failing to prevent her husband Todd from doing so. He deemed this an effort to secure "a personal interest" under the Ethics Act, through her position.
She was within her rights to fire Walt Monaghan.
BUT, she was not within her rights to put pressure, and knowingly allow her husband to put pressure, on her subordinates in an effort to get Officer Wooten fired. Two different issues. Two different findings. Really, how hard is that for you, Sarah and the rest of her talking heads to grasp?
Art has a double face, of expression and illusion.
Updated On: 10/26/08 at 11:18 AM
#64
Posted: 10/26/08 at 12:51pm
Again, JB does not let the facts get in the way of his opinions.
#65
Posted: 10/26/08 at 1:00pm
Sounds like many from the other side of the aisle re facts vs opinions.
Poster Emeritus
#66
Posted: 10/26/08 at 1:19pm
I thought you were an independent Roxy?
#67
Posted: 10/26/08 at 1:24pm
That finding is still just an opinion. That's a fact.
#68
Posted: 10/26/08 at 1:35pm
It is a fact that she was NOT cleared of all wrongdoing.
It is a fact that she had the authority to fire Monegan (sp?).
It is a fact that the investigation found that she abused her power in attempting to get Trooper Wooten fired.
It is your opinion that she broke no laws.
It is a fact that she had the authority to fire Monegan (sp?).
It is a fact that the investigation found that she abused her power in attempting to get Trooper Wooten fired.
It is your opinion that she broke no laws.
#69
Posted: 10/26/08 at 8:34pm
Here's a brainteaser for you JB: If she was indeed "Cleared of all wrong-doing" as she announced, why did she convene a second tribunal, this one staffed by her appointees, to review the case?
#70
Posted: 10/26/08 at 11:00pm
Yeah, that retraction is really sincere. Post is no different from rags like Star Magazine and the National Enquirer.
The only review of a show that matters is your own.
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $71