I have to say I was creeped out by Clinton on Letterman, for the way he sounded (I know, he was sick or whatever, but it was like listening to Alice Ripley on an off night), the half-dead way he looked (I think he might need to supplement his new vegan diet), and the mainstream DNC politico response buried in his discussion of Occupy.
Right now, Occupy Wall Street is less than one month old! And look at the complex discussions it has engendered. Complexity was what was missing in Clinton's response last night. I kept thinking, oh, now we're going to get a lecture on structure and working within the mainstream by the guy who sold NAFTA to the country? How funny it should look so much like a typical lobbyist hierarchy!
Messages of real grassroots movements evolve over time. Right now, Occupy is saying it doesn't need "a leader" because it is a movement of leaders. This is incomprehensible to somebody as invested in the status quo as Clinton is.
On Letterman, we got Clinton 101. First he assured EVERYBODY he felt their pain. Then he fretted that the messages that are being sent aren't messages at all and in fact the message SHOULD be what he says it should be. He also said don't raise taxes on anybody until the economy is better. When he said the part about "Americans not resenting people who make a lot of money fairly earned..." I just wondered how the hell he missed that the entire point of Occupy is to protest the highjacking and gaming of the system by power players enriching themselves while everybody else struggles? Oh, yeah, I know why, because he's a typical "Well, what can you do?" shrugger.
I did however agree with him when he said Lady Gaga is an incredible artist.
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none