Nicole Scherzinger doubling down on the MAGA Train- Page 10

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:07pm

Sutton Ross said: "They don't care, they do the bare minimum which is how this entire thing spiraled out of control. Boris/Seb/Binauhave broken every single rule they have here. Thousands and thousands of times. They refuse to go to Truth Social because they think someone will listento them here. They all fight the same way and should be banned for excessive, constant trolling.Their lack of mental ability is not our problem. Report all of their comments please, mods will get sick of it and eventually realize all I've said here.

Drag Em!"

Been awfully quiet since earlier. Did it work? Are they banned? 🤞 

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:07pm

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 04:07 PM

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:14pm

SteveSanders said: "I think it is perfectly acceptable, and even necessary, to call out people engaged in authoritarian or fascist behavior using those terms."

For those who like to refer to Charlie Kirk or anyone grieving over his murder as a fascist, just so you know, assassinating people who think differently than you is peak fascism and authoritarian behavior.

So if you think it's necessary to call the killer those terms, why don't you?

 

 

 

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 04:14 PM

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:23pm

kdogg36 said: "conspiracy theories about the enforcement of Sharia law in Western countries. "

Do you have any clue about the Muslim Brotherhood and about the facts that are taking place in many western cities and countries today? About islam and its goal? About the numbers? About the bills that are being proposed? Looking away is a dagger stab in the backs of gay people, women, Jews, Christians, children and animals.

 

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:32pm

kdogg36 said: "I think you should be able to burn any flag, draft card, holy book, or whatever else you want to burn, as long as it's yours and you have a right to burn things there. "

I agree, unfortunately teachers, kids, parents all over the west are being slaughtered by muslims for doing even as little as drawing a picture of the prophet, or making a joke about islam, let alone burning the rag. That's islam's assignment. And that's a problem. I can show you countless news articles of the countless attacks.

[TheatreFan4]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:35pm

Seb28 said: "kdogg36 said: "conspiracy theories about the enforcement of Sharia law in Western countries."

Do you have any clue about the Muslim Brotherhood and about the facts that are taking place in many western cities and countries today? About islam and its goal? About the numbers? About the bills that are being proposed?Looking away is a dagger stab in the backs of gay people, women, Jews, Christians, children and animals.

"

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:36pm

That's your reaction? Wow.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 04:36 PM

[SteveSanders]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:46pm

Seb28 said: "SteveSanders said: "I think it is perfectly acceptable, and even necessary, to call out people engaged in authoritarian or fascist behavior using those terms."

For those who like to refer to Charlie Kirk or anyone grieving over his murder as a fascist, just so you know, assassinating people who think differently than you is peak fascism and authoritarian behavior.

So when you think it's necessary to call the killer those terms, why don't you?

I said I would not call someone a Nazi. You're misrepresenting my response.

And since you consistently demonstrate an inability to engage in good faith, this is the last time I will respond to you.





"

 

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 04:46 PM

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 4:59pm

Well, sh*t. There’s one of the stooges. 😞 

[abcd12]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:00pm

And STILL liking their own posts! 😂 So embarrassing.

[Sutton Ross]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:23pm

So basically if they aren't banned or simply leave on their own, everyone can block all three of the MAGAts. That way, no one will read a thing they have to say, effectively ending their reign of terror on here. They will scatter like roaches and finally will end this era of horror. 

And if people keep engaging, thus keeping them around longer and longer? That's entirely on them.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:23 PM

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:30pm

SteveSanders said: "Seb28 said: "SteveSanders said: "I think it is perfectly acceptable, and even necessary, to call out people engaged in authoritarian or fascist behavior using those terms."

For those who like to refer to Charlie Kirk or anyone grieving over his murder as a fascist, just so you know, assassinating people who think differently than you is peak fascism and authoritarian behavior.

So when you think it's necessary to call the killer those terms, why don't you?

I said I would not call someone a Nazi. You're misrepresenting my response.

And since you consistently demonstrate an inability to engage in good faith, this is the last time I will respond to you.
""

I was talking about another thing you said.

You said:"I think it is perfectly acceptable, and even necessary, to call out people engaged in authoritarian or fascist behavior using those terms."

That's what I reacted on. And I asked you something about that statement.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:30 PM

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:35pm

Sutton Ross said: "So basically if they aren't banned or simply leave on their own, everyonecan blockall three of the MAGAts. That way, no one will read a thing they have to say, effectively ending their reign of terror on here. They will scatter like roaches and thus will end this era of horror.

And if people keep engaging, thus keeping them around longer and longer? That's entirely on them."

So you can have nice discussions with yourselves all day, about how eliminating people with different opinions is your only tool to win, and all that your minds can grasp, and constantly agreeing with eachother on that. Sounds boring.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:35 PM

[kdogg36]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:35pm

Islander_fan said: "kdogg36 said: "They did point out that the act of burning the flag doesn’t change the fact that it has symbolic meaning."

I just wanted to add that the fact that the flag has symbolic meaning is precisely why burning it is an act of political expression.

[kdogg36]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:40pm

Sutton Ross said: "Boris/Seb/Binauhave broken every single rule they have here."

I just want to go on the record as saying that I don't believe binau is in the same category as Boris or Seb. Those two have revealed themselves as conspiracy-minded right-wing nutjobs. On the other hand, binau, in my opinion, is an annoying liberal critic of what he sees as liberal excess (much like Bill Maher, with whom he has said he identifies). I don't agree with him on a lot of things, and I think he arguably crosses the line into trolling territory when he repeats the same criticisms dozens (hundreds?) of times, but he's clearly not MAGA.

I agree with the rest of what you say. 

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:40 PM

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:47pm

abcd12 said: "And STILL liking their own posts! 😂 So embarrassing."

And STILL counting likes. So embarrassing.

Meanwhile, content-related replies of yours are nowhere to be found. You are polluting the board.

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:53pm

Sutton Ross said: "Boris/Seb/Binauhave broken every single rule they have here. Their lack of mental ability is not our problem. 
Drag Em!"

You do realize that you are breaking the rules 2 times in just this one post?

And you will not be able to find 1 post where Boris/Seb/Binau break the rules.

I wish you a wonderful journey to reality.

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:57pm

The alleged shooter was charged with various counts of murder today.  He remained expressionless.  Next hearing is September 29th.  

I knew nothing about Kirk prior to the event a few days ago.  I don't care to know more about him now.

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 5:59pm

Death penalty looms.

Do we approve?

I don't.

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 6:17pm

Jay Lerner-Z said: "Death penalty looms.

Do we approve?

I don't."

There have been some instances in the past where I supported the death penalty.  This is NOT one of those instances.

 

 

 

 

 

[Seb28]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 6:24pm

Highland Guy said: "There have been some instances in the past where I supported the death penalty. This is NOT one of those instances."


Are you not interested in the facts, motives and intentions of the killer first, before making up your mind? What is your opinion actually based on then?








 

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 06:24 PM

[Kad]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 6:49pm

Moving this thread reset the number of likes on the posts and the fact that Seb apparently went back and re-liked all of his posts is a very funny and truly revealing glimpse into his fragile ego. 

[MB124]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 6:53pm

Kad said: "Moving this threadreset the number of likes on the postsand the fact that Seb apparently went back and re-liked all of his posts is a very funny and truly revealing glimpse into hisfragile ego."

Noticed that, too. So pathetic. 

[kdogg36]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 6:54pm

Jay Lerner-Z said: "Death penalty looms. Do we approve? I don't."

No, I don't approve of the death penalty under any circumstances, whether that be the killing of Charlie Kirk or Matthew Shepard or anyone else. I simply do not think it is right for the State to put itself in the position of killing someone in cold blood, when the victim represents no in-the-moment threat to anyone's life or liberty. 

A little more idealistically, I'd like to believe that every imprisoned criminal, even those who commit heinous acts, should have the opportunity to find some positive purpose for their lives. For most of them, that would mean preparing themselves to make a contribution as a free member of society. For others, it might mean simply making life easier for their fellow prisoners. Not everyone will make good use of this opportunity, but I think everyone should have it. I believe rehabilitation, in whatever form that might take, should be the primary goal for every prisoner.

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 9/16/25 at 7:08pm

"No, I don't approve of the death penalty under any circumstances, whether that be the killing of Charlie Kirk or Matthew Shepard or anyone else. I simply do not think it is right for the State to put itself in the position of killing someone in cold blood, when the victim represents no in-the-moment threat to anyone's life or liberty. "

Ok. The alleged murderer had no problem with killing Kirk in cold blood but yet you are having issue with the state doing it. This is not some murder where there is any doubt who committed it, and you may be concerned about innocent man being put to death. I think some cases the death penalty is justified, and this is one of them. At the very least, hope the penalty is life sentence with no parole.