Nicole Scherzinger doubling down on the MAGA Train — Page 10

Sutton Ross said: "They don't care, they do the bare minimum which is how this entire thing spiraled out of control. Boris/Seb/Binauhave broken every single rule they have here. Thousands and thousands of times. They refuse to go to Truth Social because they think someone will listento them here. They all fight the same way and should be banned for excessive, constant trolling.Their lack of mental ability is not our problem. Report all of their comments please, mods will get sick of it and eventually realize all I've said here.

Drag Em!"

Been awfully quiet since earlier. Did it work? Are they banned? 🤞

SteveSanders said: "I think it is perfectly acceptable, and even necessary, to call out people engaged in authoritarian or fascist behavior using those terms."

For those who like to refer to Charlie Kirk or anyone grieving over his murder as a fascist, just so you know, assassinating people who think differently than you is peak fascism and authoritarian behavior.

So if you think it's necessary to call the killer those terms, why don't you?

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 04:14 PM

kdogg36 said: "I think you should be able to burn any flag, draft card, holy book, or whatever else you want to burn, as long as it's yours and you have a right to burn things there. "

I agree, unfortunately teachers, kids, parents all over the west are being slaughtered by muslims for doing even as little as drawing a picture of the prophet, or making a joke about islam, let alone burning the rag. That's islam's assignment. And that's a problem. I can show you countless news articles of the countless attacks.

That's your reaction? Wow.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 04:36 PM

Well, sh*t. There’s one of the stooges. 😞

So basically if they aren't banned or simply leave on their own, everyone can block all three of the MAGAts. That way, no one will read a thing they have to say, effectively ending their reign of terror on here. They will scatter like roaches and finally will end this era of horror.

And if people keep engaging, thus keeping them around longer and longer? That's entirely on them.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:23 PM

Sutton Ross said: "So basically if they aren't banned or simply leave on their own, everyonecan blockall three of the MAGAts. That way, no one will read a thing they have to say, effectively ending their reign of terror on here. They will scatter like roaches and thus will end this era of horror.

And if people keep engaging, thus keeping them around longer and longer? That's entirely on them."

So you can have nice discussions with yourselves all day, about how eliminating people with different opinions is your only tool to win, and all that your minds can grasp, and constantly agreeing with eachother on that. Sounds boring.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:35 PM

Sutton Ross said: "Boris/Seb/Binauhave broken every single rule they have here."

I just want to go on the record as saying that I don't believe binau is in the same category as Boris or Seb. Those two have revealed themselves as conspiracy-minded right-wing nutjobs. On the other hand, binau, in my opinion, is an annoying liberal critic of what he sees as liberal excess (much like Bill Maher, with whom he has said he identifies). I don't agree with him on a lot of things, and I think he arguably crosses the line into trolling territory when he repeats the same criticisms dozens (hundreds?) of times, but he's clearly not MAGA.

I agree with the rest of what you say.

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 05:40 PM

Sutton Ross said: "Boris/Seb/Binauhave broken every single rule they have here. Their lack of mental ability is not our problem.
Drag Em!"

You do realize that you are breaking the rules 2 times in just this one post?

And you will not be able to find 1 post where Boris/Seb/Binau break the rules.

I wish you a wonderful journey to reality.

Death penalty looms.

Do we approve?

I don't.

Highland Guy said: "There have been some instances in the past where I supported the death penalty. This is NOT one of those instances."


Are you not interested in the facts, motives and intentions of the killer first, before making up your mind? What is your opinion actually based on then?

Updated On: 9/16/25 at 06:24 PM

Kad said: "Moving this threadreset the number of likes on the postsand the fact that Seb apparently went back and re-liked all of his posts is a very funny and truly revealing glimpse into hisfragile ego."

Noticed that, too. So pathetic.

"No, I don't approve of the death penalty under any circumstances, whether that be the killing of Charlie Kirk or Matthew Shepard or anyone else. I simply do not think it is right for the State to put itself in the position of killing someone in cold blood, when the victim represents no in-the-moment threat to anyone's life or liberty. "

Ok. The alleged murderer had no problem with killing Kirk in cold blood but yet you are having issue with the state doing it. This is not some murder where there is any doubt who committed it, and you may be concerned about innocent man being put to death. I think some cases the death penalty is justified, and this is one of them. At the very least, hope the penalty is life sentence with no parole.