Well, of course. Even as someone who could not be farther on the spectrum from a performer, I know that it would be absolutely futile and wrong to do it for the awards. It's an added bonus, an extra thing to strive for. But if you're doing it for the awards, you're in the wrong place. But, I don't doubt for a second that almost every performer out there, somewhere deep down, hopes for it some day. And so when you're nominated, even if you don't have your hopes up, even if you don't really even
care anymore, there's going to be a little bit of hope there. That has nothing to do with being a performer. You don't need to be a performer to understand that. It's human nature.
Anyway, I hope I didn't suggest that you need a Tony to be considered a good actor, that Raul needs one to maintain his 'status' or to prove his worth, I'd like to correct that assumption, because it's absolutely not true. But this discussion reminds me of one I got into on the Main Board not too long ago, about how it's not simply about whether one actor is deserving of an award or not -- year to year, it's almost MORE dependent on what else has been up there year and who they're going against than it is on the performance in isolation. Of COURSE I think Raul deserves a Tony. Of COURSE I think he is an award-worthy actor. And I don't think my saying I'm not going to get my hopes up this year should be taken to mean I think that any less. It's just about being reasonable.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 5/16/09 at 01:20 AM