clinton vs. sanders your vote? — Page 73

" I also think the big winner last night was Bloomberg."

I have to say, I would vote for Hillary Clinton a million times before I cast a vote for Bloomberg. And it's crazy to me that he thinks he would be a better alternative to Sanders than Clinton.

"And it's crazy to me that he thinks he would be a better alternative to Sanders than Clinton."

The establishment loathes both Trump and Sanders due to the fact that neither is beholden to the party bosses or the super PACs. Ted Cruz as POTUS is a doomsday scenario for all concerned. No establishment candidate on the GOP side of the ledger is gaining any real traction save Kasich whose miracle 2nd place finish in NH was a one-off. Clinton is surprisingly vulnerable and a sense of deja vu is starting to set in. Great minds have suggested in the past that theworld needs a final arbiter. Yet it's not clear that the bulk of electorate trusts either of the leading contenders in that capacity.

Bloomsberg needs to get on all 50 state ballots by the end of the month to do any real damage according to DC pundits. I suspect that his main aim is to deny Sanders any chance of taking up residence at 1600 Penn Ave NW. Sanders has three obstacles before him, namely Clinton, the GOP, and the Moneyed Elites across the board in no particular order.

ETA: I came across an article that describes the block and tackle of this election cycle better than I ever could. http://www.lincolntimesnews.com/2016/02/10/discarding-unelectable-candidates-but-holding-on-to-their-supporters-enthusiasm/

Updated On: 2/10/16 at 09:37 AM

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-delegate-tracker/

Clinton's still ahead in the delegate count 394 to 44. There'a long road ahead of both to 2,382.

Superdelegates can change their minds. That's their superpower.

PalJoey said: "Superdelegates can change their minds. That's their superpower."

... Not if they're bought by Hillary Clinton

Yes, I am aware of your past history with little boys... THAT explains why you spend sooo much time on the internet! Gotta git yer fix, eh?

You saying I'm not doesn't really move the conversation forward. Time to take a hard look in the mirror and wonder how you ended up pushing 50 or 60 (or 70!) without any significant other, friends, or offspring. Time to let go and find the joy in life. Not in a message board. Can't you just embrace love and happiness and light?

I'm concerned about Namo and the pleasure he gets of living life on the edge.... that's all.

Really? Because more and more you come off like a nasty homophobe who has been pretending to be a gay man.

Yes, it's clearly what Phyllis meant.

Wouldn't it be hurtful to the Dems if Clinton loses the popular vote in the primaries but wins the delegate vote? She is the one who is effing up again, she should have never taken speaking fees from the bankers. It's going to be very hard for her to try and run this campaign when coziness with the banks sticks out like a sore thumb. It's amazing what Sanders is doing with donations. Not one wealthy Democrat leans Sanders way. This is a great story for the folks who don't have a lot of money to give politicians. You can pretend all you want that she is a lock for the White House, but you're being disingenuous with yourself. Any spelling or misuse of vocabulary? Please accept apologies, no excuse happy hour hasn't started yet.

Liza, you're weird, if anything you say about Namo is true,which it probably isn't, it looks way worse that you would pretend to know about it.

"you must have been bullied very badly and I'm not sure the bullies didn't have a point."

One of the greatest things ever written on the interweb.