#2
Posted: 3/15/06 at 4:51pm
I dunno, though I wouldn't be surprised. If ticket sales are strong, then I don't see why he wouldn't.
#3
Posted: 3/15/06 at 4:53pm
I think it will turn into an open-ended run.
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."
-Charlie Manson
#4
Posted: 3/15/06 at 4:56pm
As long as tickets sales stay strong (which will be for quite a while), the engagement will be extended, I'd bet. They dont call Mackintosh a marketing genius for nothing.
#5
Posted: 3/15/06 at 4:58pm
Does that mean that the Rum Tum Tugger will be on Broadway again then?
Mmmm, I wouldn't be sad if other shows start "closing" then, they could be just following the new Mackintosh business plan.
Mmmm, I wouldn't be sad if other shows start "closing" then, they could be just following the new Mackintosh business plan.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#6
Posted: 3/15/06 at 4:59pm
How bad was the production doing (tickets sales wise) when it originally closed on Broadway?
"Art is always in crisis: you must work fast to write in the breath on the window."
-Edward Bond
#7
Posted: 3/15/06 at 5:17pm
I would think it was pretty even - high and low depending on the season, but in average with most shows.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#8
Posted: 3/15/06 at 5:21pm
Mackintosh joked, even at the final performance, that he had to close the show in order to be able to revive it. I guess maybe there was some truth in that!
#9
Posted: 3/15/06 at 5:22pm
I doubt it will extend. I hope it doesn't extend. The reasons for bringing the show back were pretty pathetic.
Nothing precious, plain to see, don't make a fuss over me. Not loud, not soft, but somewhere inbetween. Say sorry, just let it be the word you mean.
#10
Posted: 3/15/06 at 6:45pm
If he is bringing in cast members who have done the show for some time for the same roles, then perhaps that is probable. Renew interest by stopping the Broadway run and revive it within a few years.
If he brings in a special cast and makes the run part of the overall 21st anniversary celebrations in London ( which would emphasize that it is the longest-running musical in the world), then maybe it will be a limited run.
If he brings in a special cast and makes the run part of the overall 21st anniversary celebrations in London ( which would emphasize that it is the longest-running musical in the world), then maybe it will be a limited run.
Updated On: 3/15/06 at 06:45 PM
#11
Posted: 3/15/06 at 6:48pm
I don't understand the whole "21st Anniversary" thing. Who celebartes a 21st?
#12
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:13pm
Word on the "street" is it will extend at least thru $mas.
#13
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:15pm
I expect 100% that it will play an open-ended run. I also expect that no other revivials will open next season. Nothing will be able to beat Les Mis and Chorus Line at the Tonys.
#14
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:17pm
There should be some sort of Broadway rule that makes sure when a production closes it can't come back to Broadway, to protect it from becoming a huge recycling factory.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#15
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:19pm
By that standard, blaxx, we'll never have any revivals.
However, there is a Tony regulation that for a show to be considered a revival, it must be produced 3 years after the original closed.
However, there is a Tony regulation that for a show to be considered a revival, it must be produced 3 years after the original closed.
#16
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:24pm
No, a revival, with a whole different creative team on board, I understand, and I'm all about giving all those shows a new life.
What I'm against is opening and closing the exact same production, I think it diminishes the credibility of Broadway as a huge part of the American culture... I think it's important that the development and new creations for Broadway are always taken care of, because if Cats, Phantom, Wicked, etc. are going to close and come back, and back and forth, it's a huge step back from advancing. The show had its life, it finished and could continue touring all over the planet, but, please, no recycling!
What I'm against is opening and closing the exact same production, I think it diminishes the credibility of Broadway as a huge part of the American culture... I think it's important that the development and new creations for Broadway are always taken care of, because if Cats, Phantom, Wicked, etc. are going to close and come back, and back and forth, it's a huge step back from advancing. The show had its life, it finished and could continue touring all over the planet, but, please, no recycling!
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#17
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:26pm
There is no way LES MIS can be considered a revival. It will probably be eligible ONLY for acting (and nothing else), or considered a special event.
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."
-Charlie Manson
#18
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:29pm
Les Mis will be considered a revival. There was an article in the Times a few weeks ago about it.
Broadway is a dying industry, though. Tickets are $111 a piece for shows that close before they reach 100 performances. People don't want to spend money to see a new production of Les Miserables or A Chorus Line. Critics don't want to see a new production of shows that defined the theater, like Les Mis or ACL.
The audience wants to see something they're familiar with. Why do you think that the bulk of the shows opening this season are based on movies/books/prewritten music?
Broadway is a dying industry, though. Tickets are $111 a piece for shows that close before they reach 100 performances. People don't want to spend money to see a new production of Les Miserables or A Chorus Line. Critics don't want to see a new production of shows that defined the theater, like Les Mis or ACL.
The audience wants to see something they're familiar with. Why do you think that the bulk of the shows opening this season are based on movies/books/prewritten music?
Updated On: 3/15/06 at 07:29 PM
#19
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:31pm
There was an article in the times that the tony committee decided LES MIS will be a revival before any of them have seen it? Not possible.
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."
-Charlie Manson
#20
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:32pm
Yes, Yankee, I understand, and I think it's very sad.
But this "let's close and bring them back" sounds like a very smart business move, but very very low in many ways.
But this "let's close and bring them back" sounds like a very smart business move, but very very low in many ways.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#21
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:35pm
Munk, the statute of limitations is 3 years. Anything after 3 years (Les Mis would be at 3 1/2) is fair game.
#22
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:39pm
Even if it's an EXACT replica of the original production?
I would put money on the fact that the Tony's will not consider LES MIS eligible for best revivial, considering the direction, scenery, lighting, costumes, EVERYTHING - will be identical to the original production. It's just not logical.
I would put money on the fact that the Tony's will not consider LES MIS eligible for best revivial, considering the direction, scenery, lighting, costumes, EVERYTHING - will be identical to the original production. It's just not logical.
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."
-Charlie Manson
#23
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:48pm
wow, Macintosh is sure cutting that 3-year Tony rule really slim, i mean i dont think it even has been 3 years since LES MIS closed...
but anyway, back to the point, i have mixed reactions for this revival. I am very excited because I never got to see the Broadway production, so that is a positive thing. And I do agree it is a very smart business move. But I just hope they keep it limited to the 6 months, because I am eagar to see newer shows, and just because a lot of ALW's recent shows have not faired so well, I don't think they should revive all of his hits this early on.
but anyway, back to the point, i have mixed reactions for this revival. I am very excited because I never got to see the Broadway production, so that is a positive thing. And I do agree it is a very smart business move. But I just hope they keep it limited to the 6 months, because I am eagar to see newer shows, and just because a lot of ALW's recent shows have not faired so well, I don't think they should revive all of his hits this early on.
#24
Posted: 3/15/06 at 7:59pm
What? Revive all of his hits this early on in what?
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."
-Charlie Manson
#25
Posted: 3/15/06 at 8:02pm
Is there a rule for revivals? That they have to have different directors?
I think it is considered a revival.
I think it is considered a revival.
The smallest stream is a valent river. It will drown me if it can.
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central