Robbie:
I wasn't getting nasty with you, if that's how it came off. In the past I have avoided you because of some uncalled for bitter things you have said to me, for no reason. In this case, I enjoyed reading your review and you certainly do have a lovely way of putting your thoughts into words. It's nice to read a review on here that is actually comprehensible. Although it was a great review, I don't agree with most of it, as I said. For me, whenever I have seen the stage production, despite how close to the stage I sit, the whole show seems very unattainable. It's not a very welcoming show - as an audience member, I have always felt left out and excluded from what's goin on onstage. I think maybe it's because of the bare-bones set used in some scenes that now look extremely dated, decorated with the actors standing around it on stage. It just never, ever captured me. It never haunted me, it never broke my heart, and I have never cared about a single thing that happened to any of the characters. With that said, going into the movie I was not at all a fan of the show. I think it has some beautiful melodies and wonderful individual moments, but the whole show always seemed choppy. The first 15 minutes of the movie, I thought, were remarkable. When the color changes from B&W to Color as the Chandelier rises and the Overture deafens you, it definitely gave me chills and pulled me in from the very start. From "Angel of Music" through "The Music of the Night" I was bored out of my mind, and I think they were terribly "staged" and filmed. After that, I was really engaged in the film.
Now the cast. From hearing the CD before the movie came out I was very disappointed and quite angry about their voices - Emmy and Gerard. Patrick's voice is perfect for the role. Their voices aren't something I can listen to on a soundtrack - they're just not that good. But in the movie, they work quite nicely. I wish Emmy wasn't so breathy through the whole thing, and I would hardly call her amazing, or even great - but it didn't bother me. As skeptical as I was about Gerard's voice going into it, I could not have enjoyed him more. I thought his performance in this movie was so touching and gentle. You see every side to the phantom - you can actually see how loving and amazing a man he can be, then you can see how evil and nasty he can be - something the stage production never showed me. I've always disliked the Phantom and hated the moments he was onstage on Broadway because he was so annoying to me. In this movie, although the material hasn't changed, I loved the notion that the Phantom is actually a very VERY attractive guy. I could see why Christine might be so interested in him - he looked beautiful. I thought his voice was perfect for the movie - anything too operetic or "broadway" would have annoyed me. I really really really loved his interpretation, and now I can't really listen to Crawford on the recording because he just annoys me - as a performer, he's ALWAYS annoyed me. So maybe it's a personal thing, who knows.
As far as Mdme. Giry having a French accent, I took it as if she were the only one that truly grew up in France. Everyone else in the movie is from somewhere else in Europe, so they wouldn't have French accents, including Christine and the theatre owners. After thinking about it, my theory is slighly invalid because her daughter Meg would also have a french accent, as should the Phantom if he grew up with Mdme. Giry IN the opera house. I forgot about that fact, so I would say you're right - it doesn't make sense that she's the only one with a French accent. I think they tried to make her a stereotypical French ballet teacher and didn't really think about the reasoning. She doesn't have an accent on Broadway, does she?
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."
-Charlie Manson