Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:04am
Best Recording of Jesus Christ Superstar? Or: Why is Josh Young so hot?
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:08am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:18am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:18am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:21am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:25am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:45am
P.S. Josh Young is sweet, thoughtful, sensitive and indeed hot in person. His Che in Stratford was also amazing.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:46am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:50am
Posted: 6/12/12 at 11:55am
There is the 2011 German concert album with Drew Sarich which is in English, includes all of the songs, and doesn't have any faded out numbers, but the Judas on that recording is terrible and the German accents all around are slightly distracting. Still, it's the only recording I've been able to find that is truly complete so it's the one I've been listening to lately.
Most of the revival cast speaks very highly of the original brown album, but there are songs that fade out and cut off and it is, of course, missing "Could We Start Again, Please?" If that doesn't bother you I would suggest that one or the 1996 recording.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 12:04pm
I have a fondness for the original too, especially Murray Head's superb Judas. The 1992 Australian one is supposed to be excellent (I see it recommended frequently), so I placed an order for it on Amazon last week. It's not arrived yet so I haven't listened to it.
Updated On: 6/12/12 at 12:04 PM
Posted: 6/12/12 at 12:06pm
It's weak and slows the momentum of the show down.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 12:17pm
Posted: 6/12/12 at 12:18pm
Posted: 6/12/12 at 12:23pm
And Scorpion, the 1996 recording, like most of the double disc recordings is essentially complete, but like I said it mirrors the brown album and fades out "Superstar" and cuts off "The Crucifixion." It's not a huge deal, but it really bugs the crap out of me that they do that.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 12:57pm
It's weak and slows the momentum of the show down.
Practically speaking: to give Mary Magdalene (and Peter) more of a presence in the second act in terms of vocal opportunities.
Plot-wise: Its purpose is to prevent mood whiplash. Almost all of Act Two is heavy drama, except, at least in most productions, for "King Herod's Song," which is treated as comic relief. On the original album, it worked as a break from the heavy drama simply by virtue of being a slow, simple number in a wholly different style from much of the score, but that doesn't work on stage; stage has a different dynamic from records, especially when Herod's number is one of the few that immediately calls for flashy "show biz" choreography, a real "number," as it were. On stage, it plays as a wild, raucous moment riddled with dark humor, a big socko smash, the laugh of the evening, going right into the suicidal breakdown of a man (quite literally) at the end of his rope... that's a hell of a transition, which comes sandwiched between more heavy drama.
From a structural position, "Could We Start Again..." is needed to bring the audience back into the drama, to gently remind them of what is going on in the plot, and at the same time to reveal how Mary, Peter, Simon (in the 2000 revival), Judas (in the current Broadway revival; yes, they made it work, don't ask, just go buy a ticket), feel about the turn of events. That can bring us into Judas' suicide without the sudden "Wait, what the hell was that?" feeling.
Its purpose has been somewhat obscured in current productions, because everybody seems to want to move it around, or change it, or try to give it another purpose. I've seen people attempt to use it as a post-"John 19:41" resurrection scene (usually using the additional lyrics from the Paul Nicholas/Claire Moore single version from 1992 -- by and large, I detest these mediocre, generic "pop song" lyrics, which, to me, show how little the show's authors regard the song, that they were willing to massage it into a single); I've seen at least one production that inserted the number, somehow, into the middle of the thirty-nine lashes, which is at least closer to the song's original purpose, but it pulls attention away from the main event.
I'm tired of people attempting to re-purpose it. It doesn't need another purpose; it's serving its purpose just fine the way it is.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 1:19pm

I have spent perhaps a total of a half hour with him at different stage doors and he is the hottest, kindest, most modest and talented man I've ever met in my life. He's really funny too.
I mean it's not really disputable
Posted: 6/12/12 at 1:38pm
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:21pm
I wish they would record this revival, one of the major reasons being I'd like a recorded version of this specific version of "Could We Start Again Please?" and, of course, of Josh Young's performance. I see a lot of love for Josh in this thread, you excepted, Jordan
Also: is Jeremy Kushnier seriously being wasted so shamelessly? I was so excited to see him in the Playbill, I adore his voice and have since he did Bright Lights Big City.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:32pm
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:32pm
Kelly2, Jeremy Kushnier is the understudy for Judas, Jesus, and Pilate. I haven't seen him go on, but Josh Young was sick for quite a while when the show's run started. I know a number of people who saw Jeremy go on as Judas, all of whom raved about him and insisted Josh Young, whom they'd never seen/heard of, couldn't possibly compare (to be fair, Josh's performances on camera, such as at the Tonys, never seem to capture the charisma and incredible voice he shows on stage). I would love to see it with Josh as Judas and Jeremy as Jesus sometime.
Updated On: 6/12/12 at 02:32 PM
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:37pm
I like Chilina Kennedy and I like the harder edges she's trying to give Mary, but I'm not sure this is a great role for her. Vocally she's fine.
Updated On: 6/13/12 at 02:37 PM
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:37pm
Papa, I can't believe I missed that. God, I'd love to see him go on for Jesus or Judas. I'm sure he would be incredible.
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:40pm
Posted: 6/12/12 at 2:55pm
BroadwayWorld TV