Well, the Tanz vs. DOTV issue was more a matter of approach. The problems that were present in the American version are truthfully equally present in the European.
In both editions, it could never decide whether it was fish or flesh, comedy or serious drama, and as a result it was neither. (This is a show that, in either case, requires its audience to take "Total Eclipse of the Heart" seriously as a love duet between a vampire and his potential victim at the top of Act II, sharing space with a song later in the same act where that vampire lectures the audience on how our greed will be our doom, monologuing about the existential pain of eternal life and of losing everything and everyone he loves.)
Moreover, in a broad sense, both versions tread essentially the same path -- in Tanz's case, its original form constantly winks at the mega-musical genre, conjuring memories of The Phantom of the Opera with chief vampire Krolock's material, and Les Misérables in songs like "Garlic." As for DOTV, faced with a book and score ultimately at odds with each other, the American creative team decided on a sophomoric silly approach in hopes the results would be perceived as a more direct parody of mega-musicals, like the later stage version of Young Frankenstein. (And were about as successful as YF was in its Broadway incarnation.)
Difference was in that old George Abbott truism: "If you play it for comedy, it won't work. If you play it for real, it will." There's never been a better example. Tanz played it straight, with a dark, subtle sense of humor, whereas DOTV went for the laughs, milking every "punchline" it could. One approach is clearly better than the other if you want the piece to appear seamless and disguise its intrinsic issues, and the proof is in how long it's been running all over Europe.
Formerly gvendo2005
Broadway Legend
joined: 5/1/05
Blocked: After Eight, suestorm, david_fick, emlodik, lovebwy, Dave28282, joevitus, BorisTomashevsky, Seb28
Updated On: 2/3/20 at 02:52 PM