Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 12/24/17

[Rob]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 3:49pm

Click below to access all the Broadway grosses from all the shows for the week ending 12/24/2017 in BroadwayWorld's grosses section.

Also, you will find information on each show's historical grosses, cumulative grosses and other statistics on how each show stacked up this week and in the past.

Click Here to Visit the Broadway Grosses...

Up for the week by attendance was: THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA (21.1%), CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY (9.0%), SCHOOL OF ROCK (7.2%), JUNK (6.8%), SPONGEBOB SQUAREPANTS (6.7%), THE PLAY THAT GOES WRONG (5.1%), ONCE ON THIS ISLAND (4.4%), ANASTASIA (2.7%), KINKY BOOTS (2.7%), LATIN HISTORY FOR MORONS (2.6%), MISS SAIGON (2.4%), WICKED (1.3%), THE LION KING (0.3%), HAMILTON (0.2%), METEOR SHOWER (0.2%), HELLO, DOLLY! (0.1%),

Down for the week by attendance was: BEAUTIFUL (-15.9%), THE PARISIAN WOMAN (-7.4%), HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS (-6.6%), THE CHILDREN (-6.1%), WAITRESS (-2.3%), A BRONX TALE THE MUSICAL (-1.7%), FARINELLI AND THE KING (-0.5%), THE BOOK OF MORMON (-0.5%), ALADDIN (-0.4%), CHICAGO (-0.3%), COME FROM AWAY (-0.3%), CATS (-0.2%),

Click Here to Visit the BroadwayWorld Grosses...

[raddersons]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:04pm

--Just want to add that lots of shows only had 7 performances this week as opposed to the usual 8. 

[Broadway Joe]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:05pm

Home for the holidays couldn't even crack 100k the week leading up to Xmas, amazing lol

[ACL2006]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:22pm

HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS averaged just 280 people per performance. John Lithgow outgrossed the show and he only did 3 performances and nearly had more people see his show in his three performances than HFTH. Interesting note today: while checking out the TKTS app around 1:00, I noticed only four Broadway shows available; John Lithgow, The Children, The Parisian Woman & Home For The Holidays. How sad to walk up to the TKTS booth and only have those as your options(more shows were available earlier in the day). This week is basically the make or break week for shows. If you can't make money this week, it's time to pack it in.

[barcelona20]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:26pm

OOTI looking good.

[RaisedOnMusicals]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:29pm

Thoughts:

1. DEH is still incredibly strong. Set a new weekly high, at an average ticket price of over $235. It wasn’t that long ago that we were shocked when Hamilton was at that level;

2. The Band’s Visit had an amazing gross for a seven performance week;

3. The Parisian Woman is not faring well. It’s sliding week to week. 

[BroadwayConcierge]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:31pm

Nobody’s gonna mention HAMILTON making nearly $3.8 million this week?! Holy CRAP!

[barcelona20]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:38pm

BroadwayConcierge said: "Nobody’s gonna mention HAMILTON making nearly $3.8 million this week?! Holy CRAP!"

It's good to be Lin.

[passing strange]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:49pm

barcelona20 said: "OOTI looking good."

I was glad to see that too.  I saw it on Saturday.  It was awesome!  I will definitely see it again.

[Smaxie]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 4:56pm

Mark Rylance is the new Amy Schumer.

[HogansHero]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 5:38pm

barcelona20 said: "OOTI looking good."

not if you are referring to the grosses. The show itself, sure. 

 

[dramamama611]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 5:49pm

RaisedOnMusicals said: "Thoughts:

1. DEH is still incredibly strong. Set a new weekly high, at an average ticket price of over $235. It wasn’t that long ago that we were shocked when Hamilton was at that level;

2. The Band’s Visit had an amazing gross for a seven performance week;

3. The Parisian Woman is not faring well. It’s sliding week to week."

 

 

 

Of course DEH is "still" looking good.   Tickets for these dates were purchased MONTHS ago -- and, a quick look at their website...tickets are avaialble in Jan (likely only premium, and during the week...and then weekends open up in Feb, but the spring has availability.)   I'm not screaming doomsday for the show, certainly.

 

[GreasedLightning]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 8:07pm

I’m thrilled for Anastasia.

Spongebob not looking bad, either.

[chernjam]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 8:24pm

Has anyone discussed what went wrong with the Miss Saigon revival?  The way they hyped it after the London run, I really would never have predicted in their closing weeks, Cats would be grossing over a million and Saigon would be in the 600's

[Jarethan]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 9:44pm

barcelona20 said: "OOTI looking good."

In what universe?  The gross still reflects discounted tickets in this the second or third busiest week of the year.

[Jarethan]

Posted: 12/27/17 at 9:50pm

chernjam said: "Has anyone discussed what went wrong with the Miss Saigon revival? The way they hyped it after the London run, I really would never have predicted in their closing weeks, Cats would be grossing over a million and Saigon would be in the 600's"

I think people just didn't need to see Miss Saigon again.  I saw the Fathom Events last summer (or was it the summer before?) and loved it; ironically, the result was that I had no need to see it live again. 

[Pauly3]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 1:02am

barcelona20 said: "OOTI looking good."

Jarethan said: "In what universe? The gross still reflects discounted tickets in this the second or third busiest week of the year."

The (increased) gross also reflects only 7 performances.  "Looking good" may be a stretch in the big picture (based on known and unknown info), but the related comment was a long way from wholly unreasonable (based on known and unknown info).

[ethan231h]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 1:28am

why the dip for waitress...I know they performed 1 less show but I doubt thats why..

[Jessetenny]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 6:57am

Happy for Once on This Island for gaining momentum, and still going up in gross even though there was one less performance. Spongebob is climbing likely due to the holidays but happy to see it succeed before Frozen comes in. Home for the Holidays is a mess. I can't wait to see the Waitress numbers for when Sara and Jason are together, only single seats left for the first few performances at $600.00 a ticket.

[Lot666]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 8:24am

Jarethan said: "chernjam said: "Has anyone discussed what went wrong with the Miss Saigon revival? The way they hyped it after the London run, I really would never have predicted in their closing weeks, Cats would be grossing over a million and Saigon would be in the 600's"

I think people just didn't need to see Miss Saigon again. I saw the Fathom Events last summer (or was it the summer before?) and loved it; ironically, the result was that I had no need to see it live again."

I saw the revival once in London, saw the Fathom Events cinema screening, and saw the Broadway revival three times. If I had an opportunity, I'd go again.

[Princeton2]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 8:40am

chernjam said: "Has anyone discussed what went wrong with the Miss Saigon revival? The way they hyped it after the London run, I really would never have predicted in their closing weeks, Cats would be grossing over a million and Saigon would be in the 600's"

 

It's really not that surprising. The London production wasn't as successful as people (Inc Cameron) make out. They were expecting to run years and it started to slow down in it's first year. Probably not helped by them announcing a huge advance and saying it had paid back it's investment early, when the advance and paying back investment aren't the same thing. Makes good pr though

I also suspect, although announced as a limited run, they hoped it would extend on Broadway 

[grumpyoptimist]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 9:07am

ethan231h said: "why the dip for waitress...I know they performed 1 less show but I doubt thats why.."

Wasn't one of their perfs on Christmas Day?  For a show hovering at or above 100% for a couple months, I wonder if that number of people aren't willing to go on Christmas itself (so you get a solid number, but not spectacular, knocking down your average).  Just a thought...

[Babe_Williams]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 9:09am

chernjam said: "Has anyone discussed what went wrong with the Miss Saigon revival? The way they hyped it after the London run, I really would never have predicted in their closing weeks, Cats would be grossing over a million and Saigon would be in the 600's"

 

A combination of factors, that many people have already seen it, that with the mood of the country, maybe people want to see something uplifting and not a show that is depressing from start to finish, that its not a show geared towards families like Cats, that the actors in it aren't known beyond the theater crowd. IDK. 

[raddersons]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 10:00am

Miss Saigon may have had some revolutionary design and performances years ago, but content-wise it was never an award winner. In today's climate it is melodramatic and offensive (in my opinion). Oddly enough, one of the most "meh" plays this season for me (M Butterfly) did an amazing job at dissecting why Miss Saigon is so problematic. It also got a bad Times review, and some lukewarm other reviews... which can be killer. I'd like to think audiences got more critical.

That being said, I'm a liberal NYC theater fanatic and I care about these things. Do mid-western tourists?

[AEA AGMA SM]

Posted: 12/28/17 at 10:42am

grumpyoptimist said: "ethan231h said: "why the dip for waitress...I know they performed 1 less show but I doubt thats why.."

Wasn't one of their perfs on Christmas Day? For a show hovering at or above 100% for a couple months, I wonder if that number of people aren't willing to go on Christmas itself (so you get a solid number, but not spectacular, knocking down your average). Just a thought..."

Christmas Day would not be accounted for in this report, since it was Monday and the gross reports go from Monday to Sunday.

That being said, for both Waitress and Once on This Island this is a case where the potential gross percentage is a number to look at and take into consideration. Yes, Waitress took a dip, but pulling in 95% of your gross potential is nothing that the producers need to worry about. As for Once on This Island, pulling in 85% of your gross potential is again a pretty good sign, as it would take some extraordinarily bad producing to put up a show that would have a weekly break-even point that high.