Michael Bennett,
I saw Caldwell and Lupone multiple times, Dunaway 1 1/2 times.
As a showman and in-general performer I appreciate LuPone, as an actress I am not as enthusiastic. However, to be fair, LuPone did a splendid job. I remember McNally commenting that LuPone brought her innate sense of music to the stage, which I agree with.
LuPone's big handicap was following Caldwell. Replacing was something I recall she never did as a rule, but at the time to be ask to follow Caldwell was something of a complement.
Still, it was like looking at a light bulb after staring at the sun.
Dunaway, however, was literally frightening. I've come to believe that she equates good acting with being "hard"... just like some actors consider good acting being as "vulnerable" as possible. Two extremes.
Dunaway had no grasp of the humor or elegance of the piece. She was fierce, mean and volcanically abusive. While other actor understood that this Callas was tough for the love of art, Dunaway was almost sadistic and really seemed to be raging about something personal to Dunaway rather than Callas.
If the material itself had been hackneyed the performance would have been high camp. Instead Dunaway's severe performance leached any life and joy the audience had coming into the theatre.
The one moment I was hoping would work was when the young singer in the second act confronts Callas with the line " You just want to make it hard on us because it hard on you!" THAT was a moment when Dunaway could have slightly redeemed herself. All the other actors playing the role understood that to some degree Callas had to relfect on the truth of that statement. Instead Dunaway just ratcheted up the "hardness" and gave the impression that she would have physically assaulted the young girl if there weren't witnesses.
Updated On: 10/26/09 at 12:15 PM