#26
Posted: 2/15/15 at 8:58am
Those who have responded with "Broadway is a business" missed the point of the original message.
This was not intended to be an old man's lament of "I remember when..." ticket prices were cheaper. I'm making a purely business argument, intended to appeal to a producer's focus on the bottom-line: that if you're charging $150-175 per ticket, but only actually reaping $25 per seat, and not selling 2/3 of your tickets (as is the case in On the Town; similar numbers are likely true for many other quickly-shuttered shows) then you're not optimizing your sale prices. Cut the FACE cost of an orchestra ticket to a number that will put you in competition with other forms of entertainment -- say, $40 or $50 -- and the number of tickets you'll sell will skyrocket, thus offsetting any loss from a reduced asking price. The fact that the producers are, in actuality, already accepting deeply discounted sums for the tickets should make a reduction of the face value all the more palatable. Make it easier for the consumer to pay the prices you're already willing to accept (by not forcing them to use special discounting apps, or wait for TDF discounts, use TKTS booths etc.) and you will sell more tickets. The $150 - $175 asking price is a charade, and it keeps casual theatergoers away. The vast, vast majority of people are casual theatergoers, not hardcore junkies who know all the tricks of the trade vis a vis discounts. Most don't want to bother with "working" to find discounts; if you force them to, they'll just stay away from the theater, or come only on rare and special occasions. Bring down the face value to a price that is competitive with other forms of entertainment, minimize the "work" people have to do to get the discounts you're already providing, and the number of people who attend will skyrocket.
This was not intended to be an old man's lament of "I remember when..." ticket prices were cheaper. I'm making a purely business argument, intended to appeal to a producer's focus on the bottom-line: that if you're charging $150-175 per ticket, but only actually reaping $25 per seat, and not selling 2/3 of your tickets (as is the case in On the Town; similar numbers are likely true for many other quickly-shuttered shows) then you're not optimizing your sale prices. Cut the FACE cost of an orchestra ticket to a number that will put you in competition with other forms of entertainment -- say, $40 or $50 -- and the number of tickets you'll sell will skyrocket, thus offsetting any loss from a reduced asking price. The fact that the producers are, in actuality, already accepting deeply discounted sums for the tickets should make a reduction of the face value all the more palatable. Make it easier for the consumer to pay the prices you're already willing to accept (by not forcing them to use special discounting apps, or wait for TDF discounts, use TKTS booths etc.) and you will sell more tickets. The $150 - $175 asking price is a charade, and it keeps casual theatergoers away. The vast, vast majority of people are casual theatergoers, not hardcore junkies who know all the tricks of the trade vis a vis discounts. Most don't want to bother with "working" to find discounts; if you force them to, they'll just stay away from the theater, or come only on rare and special occasions. Bring down the face value to a price that is competitive with other forms of entertainment, minimize the "work" people have to do to get the discounts you're already providing, and the number of people who attend will skyrocket.