From the looks of these costumes, I am assuming they going more in the realistic MAD MEN direction than the stylized feel of the original show? Thoughts?
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
The show is a comical satire, not a realistic look at the times, the costumes (so far) look too serious, Hedy is suppose to look cheap and tacky. The Mad Man look is great for TV but this is musical comedy, it was boring in PROMISES and looks boring here so far. I mean Tammy looks gorgeous but wrong to me. Updated On: 2/10/11 at 06:34 PM
I don't like it. And I knew they were going to do this. When they announced the revival, it was very clear to me that they were going to try to play off of Mad Men. Very unfortunate. The show is a satire and this could be very bland looking, which is not how it should be.
I love this show. I just don't think I'll be loving this production. The best thing about it so far, is Rob Bartlett.
by "more in the mad men direction" i think you mean she looks like a carbon copy of Joan Holloway. i love mad men, so i think the blatant mimicry is a little much, but I guess the style has already proven itself wildly popular, so i understand them wanting to go along with it.
"If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it." -Stephen Colbert
"The show is a comical satire, not a realistic look at the times, the costumes (so far) look too serious, Hedy is suppose to look cheap and tacky.
I respectfully disagree with you there, Curtain. Clothing does not dictate whether or not something is a satire. it can be one of the ingredients, but it doesn't have to be. IMO, the more straight-laced and closer to realism something is the better the satire. Afterall, satire is making fun of the norms in life. Satire comes from the direction, the writing, and the overall tone of the production, which by nature of Loesser's and Burrow's exceptional writing already shows us that this is pure satire. I don't think you NEED to have Hedy look cheesy and knock the audience over the head with a *hint hint, wink wink*. They'll get it.
Stephen Colbert is satire, and he looks as normal as they come. It's in his actions and words that we find the satire.
"I'm an American, Damnit!!! And if it's three things I don't believe in, it's quitting and math."
Pippin, you are correct, I just think it needs a lighter, funnier take. There's no reason why the costumes (and sets and hair,etc.) can't add to the frivolity.
I don't remember the last revival being tacky, but cartoony is closer to the original material than Mad Men, the comedy is rather broad. And Robert Randolph's original sets and Robert Fletcher's costumes understood that. I am all for re-inventing the "look" but why copy a TV show that has nothing to do with this show? One is dark and dramatic and the other silly and light hearted.
I don't remember the last revival being tacky, but cartoony is closer to the original material than Mad Men, the comedy is rather broad. And Robert Randolph's original sets and Robert Fletcher's costumes understood that. I am all for re-inventing the "look" but why copy a TV show that has nothing to do with this show? One is dark and dramatic and the other silly and light hearted.