It's quite possible you won't like it then. You've narrowed in on enough shortcomings already that I have a feeling you'll be focused on those and won't be able to get beyond them.
And that's okay. Not everyone has to like everything.
I'll admit that I went in with some preconceived expectations, as well. The dramatic way they present "Bells of Notre Dame" in the movie is pretty powerful and engaging. It's different here.
Same goes with "Topsy Turvy." I could have seen this done in some sort of really splashy Broadway-like way. It was understated and unassuming though which I think worked okay in the context of the show.
As for the choir? I didn't exactly feel they overly intruded on the action. The narration on occasion? Yes. But the choir, no. I certainly didn't walk out of the theater thinking, 'What's with that choir?' Actually I think musically they blended in pretty well.
I mean, we'll see what you think. But if you have a number of established criticisms of it already, I'm not sure those will be pacified.
And again, that's okay. It won't touch everyone the way it's done.
I was able to put my preconceived notions out of my mind and once I started settling in to this telling of the story, liked it.
Maybe the German gargoyles were goofy-looking but at least their role in the show was clearly defined.
Quite the contrary. The gargoyles were the most stunning design feature of the German production and far less goofy than in the film. It was the one design element that I think should have been retained from the German production.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
IMO those reviewers are complaining for all the wrong reasons. Accusing a Disney musical of being too sweet? Especially considering that this is the darkest most sexual Disney musical of all time.
LOL at the line about the "towering orchestra." 13 players isn't even enough for a chamber orchestra. These reviews have no credibility in my book.
It's interesting it's get notes for being too dark and too light at the same time.
What I do notice is a slight anti-Disney sentiment in some of the press.
I think in each review - good, mixed or bad - has some truth to it, and I wish the team luck as they plan the future for the show at Paper Mill, and hopefully beyond.
There is definitely an anti-disney sentiment around Broadway. Not just in the press. Many posters here were hoping Aladdin would get creamed by the critics. Even Beauty and the Beast had Broadway purists foaming at the mouth when it opened in he 90's.
Updated On: 11/14/14 at 09:56 PM
Does the NY Times ever review LaJolla? There is some anti=DISNEY residue still lurking around Broadway but most of it is long gone. The critics were quite kind to ALLADIN and NEWSIES There was a time when people thought DISNEY was gonna take over but that didn't happen. Now they produce some hits and some flops and the shows mostly make money and stand on their own. But if they produce a good show it's not unjustly attacked just because DISNEY produced it. And with some of the crap that's being produced now DISNEY's rep is certainly changing. They are using Broadway vets and giving them a chance to do edgier stuff like HUNCHBACK.
Why did I read that last clump of reviews. Unoriginal because it's set in France? Good grief.
Why don't you go? Why don't you leave Manderley? He doesn't need you... he's got his memories. He doesn't love you, he wants to be alone again with her. You've nothing to stay for. You've nothing to live for really, have you?
Reviews are what they are. I've never let them stop me from seeing a show. If it's a show of interest, I'll see it anyway.
Had I waited and seen some of the critical ones on Hunchback, I still would have seen it.
And would've been glad I did too.
Much like ignoring the press on Bullets Over Broadway. I really liked that one too, and would have missed what, IMO, was a great show had I listened to the critics.
Same goes with Hunchback. Is it the best I've seen? No. But I found it moving and quite well done with some great vocal performances. It's edgier than what Disney has done before in some ways, but I like that about it too.
Well, I saw the show on Friday. It was made clear in a scene between Esmeralda and Quasimodo where he says the bells have made him deaf, but he reads lips and gets much from watching faces.
In anticipation for seeing the show at papermill in March, I decided to reread the novel. What I find really interesting that i had forgotten is that the book describes how one of the main bonds between Frollo and Quasimodo is that they both truly love the Notre Dame. This important connection was deleted from the Disney film but it seems, from the opening number that was on Tumblr, that they have somewhat brought Frollo's love of the cathedral back into the plot.