I just saw Avenue Q for the second time a couple of days ago. This time, the tour instead of the original Broadway cast. And it reminded me exactly why the show won Best Musical. It is ingenious. The concept was so unique and original for Broadway and the show is brilliantly constructed. To say it is just "a parody of Sesame Street" or to sum it up as a "show about puppets" is to completely ignore the content, writing, staging and performances.
I've seen Wicked three times and it is fun. It has some great songs (and some clunkers) and it is visually exciting (but slow and dull in places). But it is a typical dramatic musical spectacle. The structure and score are standard book musical fare and while it is undeniably popular, it simply wasn't the best musical that year. Critics agreed. The best musical isn't always the most popular and vice-versa. Sometimes it happens.
But at least we're bringing up relevent new topics for dicussion that could never have been brought up on a previous thead where it may have already been discussed for the 500th time in the last 4-and-a-half years.
It had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the original novel! Actually, it does. It just doesn't follow the novel very closely.
PS - There is no such thing as "should of". It's "should've", which is a contraction for "should have". "Should of" has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.
Any bets on when some moron is going to bitch about "confessa" because they listened to their stupid friends instead of the actual lyrics?
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 6/3/08 at 05:36 PM