Posted: 4/7/25 at 11:52pm
Groff is working his ass off, but, by the end, it seems to only exist as a vehicle for him to do what he loves night after night, which is actually spelled out, and not just implied.
Posted: 4/7/25 at 11:55pm
Getting home from tonight's show and I wish I had more to add from what others have already said. I didn't think the book was awful but it wasn't anything spectacular. The show exists and the reason to see it is to see Groff give, what I think is, a pretty wonderful performance. The music sounds great, everything looks great and the fact is, I'm at a bio jukebox musical. I knew it wasn't going to be the next "West Side Story". I didn't think Act Two was a total mess like others did but it was just an hour of "Ok, let's wrap this thing up".
I'll have to think on the whole thing of Groff introducing it as himself. I expected him to go back and forth on it throughout the show but when he didn't I kind of wondered what the point was. He does make a joke about how much spit and sweat he'll get on everyone which made me chuckle. But anyways, I enjoyed myself tonight because of him. Groff would have to do something TRULY heinous to make me not enjoy him in it. He's just that likable.
Posted: 4/8/25 at 12:00am
quizking101 said:
This is a show strictly for baby boomers and Groff fans. All others might prefer to go splish-splash in the bath with a toaster."
As a baby boomer I have no desire to hear Groff sing Bobby Darin. I can watch videos of Darin on YouTube or watch Beyond the Sea...Kevin Spacey actually sounds like him. I've pointed this out before, I know. I think any Boomers who do show up thinking they are going to get Darin, and his story will be disappointed. It's definitely a vanity project for Groff and I have no objection to that for Groff fans. Just don't promote it like it's a biography. That so many here are saying they don't understand why Darin's life is being made into a show only proves how far off base the book is.
Posted: 4/8/25 at 5:39am
I'm surprised how much these early reports are making it sound like the 92Y concert with better production value. Are there dialogue scenes or is it mostly narration?
Posted: 4/8/25 at 6:51am
VintageSnarker said: "I'm surprised how much these early reports are making it sound like the 92Y concert with better production value. Are there dialogue scenes or is it mostly narration?"
There are dialogue scenes, but there is also an abuse of a device where “Bobby” snaps his fingers to freeze the scene and deliver a snarky aside or narrative commentary
Posted: 4/8/25 at 6:56am
quizking101 said: "There are dialogue scenes, but there is also an abuse of a device where “Bobby” snaps his fingers to freeze the scene and deliver a snarky aside or narrative commentary"
This was used once in a very touching way that brought a tear to my eye, though.
Posted: 4/8/25 at 7:23am
Duplicate
Updated On: 4/8/25 at 07:23 AM
Posted: 4/8/25 at 1:48pm
Jonathan Groff is making a giant ''Splish Splash'' in ''Just in Time'' at Circle in the Square. And we're not talking about his propensity to sweat and spit, which he even jokes about.
Here's a quote from Playbill.com about Groff's point of view: “When we were developing the show over the last seven years, we kept asking this question: ‘Could I start the show as myself and establish that connection, that true connection between performer and audience, without even the artifice of character between us, so that we begin connected?” Groff said. “That’s the most important relationship to establish — if you’re going to tell the story of Bobby Darin’s life, it’s that relationship with the audience.
“He had a love affair with the audience. There’s this great song called ‘The Curtain Falls,’ where he sings, ‘If I had this to do again, I would do it for you. I would do it for you, the audience.’ That’s essentially what he’s saying. So we want the audience to feel like they had a great time, and we’re celebrating Bobby Darin. And ... we’re celebrating the art and the unparalleled magic of live performance and the relationship between performer and audience.”
If you go into ''Just in Time'' expecting a perfect note-for-note ''is it live or Memorex?'' re-creation, stay at home with your Darin records. But if you want to see a Tony winner give a tour de force that celebrates Darin's singing, style and showmanship, and leaves an audience roaring for more, Groff is a tough act to follow, especially doing ''Mack the Knife.'' And he gets a great assist from Alex Timbers, his wondrous cast and his joyously jazzy band.
(Below: Video of Groff in rehearsals for ''Just in Time'' )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oue7yHJ8bTY
Updated On: 4/9/25 at 01:48 PM
Posted: 4/9/25 at 11:23am
yyys said: "What's the running time of the show?"
Approximately 2:15 including intermission, per the show's official website.
Posted: 4/9/25 at 10:54pm
I'll let others debate the fine points of the book's appropriateness for Darin's life, but I thought it was good enough for what this evening is: a great night of Groff doing what he does best with some very talented collaborators. It looks great. It sounds great. It feels great,. Just a very enjoyable show with a few tender moments.
Also, as a very tall person, it was nice to be in a seat with legroom and to not be blocking someone's view. I was in E102 right along the center railing and thought it was a perfect front-on view for the show. Given the staging I doubt any seat would be all that bad.
Updated On: 4/10/25 at 10:54 PM
Posted: 4/9/25 at 11:09pm
Oh, for the stage door inclined - the other night I got Joe Barbara, Caesar Samaoya, Emily Bergl, Gracie Lawrence, Erika Henningsen, and Lance Roberts.
Don’t expect Groff. Someone stated that he’s usually gone not too long after curtain.
Updated On: 4/9/25 at 11:09 PM
Posted: 4/15/25 at 11:14pm
Surprising that this was such a long-gestating project for Groff and company since it feels so slapdash. The book has some real groaners that try to inject some humor and heart into the otherwise by-the-numbers biographical beats. That Saved by the Bell-esque plot device of freezing time also gets old real fast. But having said all that, Groff’s star quality carries this a long way and, at the very least, they found a way to get him into a speedo.
Posted: 4/16/25 at 5:51am
quizking101 said: "Oh, for the stage door inclined - the other night I got Joe Barbara, Caesar Samaoya, Emily Bergl, Gracie Lawrence, Erika Henningsen, and Lance Roberts.
Don’t expect Groff. Someone stated that he’s usually gone not too long after curtain."
Part of me is surprised that he’s not signing since he typically always has, and he’s spoken about his own experiences meeting his idols at the stage door, but this show clearly wipes him out. I have tickets again for August, and I really wonder if he’ll be able to extend. Those are group tickets, but the regular tickets are only on sale through July. Guess we’ll see!
Posted: 4/16/25 at 9:11am
I saw the first preview in March and would love to see it again, but won’t be back until the first week of August. Really hoping for a 2 week extension!!!
Posted: 4/17/25 at 6:23pm
Gracie Singing on Kelly Clarkson
The video above is an example of why I thought she was great. I know her band is going back on tour soon, but I hope she extends with the show.
Posted: 4/17/25 at 8:04pm
DramaTeach said: "Gracie Singing on Kelly Clarkson
The video above is an example of why I thought she was great. I know her band is going back on tour soon, but I hope she extends with the show."
She's flat much of the time.
Updated On: 4/17/25 at 08:04 PM
Posted: 4/17/25 at 11:25pm
DramaTeach said: "quizking101 said: "Oh, for the stage door inclined - the other night I got Joe Barbara, Caesar Samaoya, Emily Bergl, Gracie Lawrence, Erika Henningsen, and Lance Roberts.
Don’t expect Groff. Someone stated that he’s usually gone not too long after curtain."
Part of me is surprised that he’s not signing since he typically always has, and he’s spoken about his own experiences meeting his idols at the stage door, but this show clearly wipes him out. I have tickets again for August, and I really wonder if he’ll be able to extend. Those are group tickets, but the regular tickets are only on sale through July. Guess we’ll see!"
I expect that show to run a lot longer than its current 'plans' unless it gets crucified by the critics. Why would anyone really open a 'new' musical for a limited engagement...probably not sure of Groff's drawing power (quick burst or sustained) and waiting on reviews. If crucified, they can always say it was always intended to be a limited engagement. If business is good, they will just kick into open-ended engagement (or at least until Groff exits).
Posted: 4/18/25 at 11:23am
Has anyone done rush recently? I’m headed to NYC this weekend on a whim! And really hoping to experience this show again.
Posted: 4/19/25 at 11:22am
This conceit of Groff as a character reminds me of - wait for it - The Skin of Our Teeth, wherein Sabina is really Lily, an actress playing Sabina who surfaces throughout all three acts. I raise it because it's not a new device but wonder why it's being used outside of a nightclub setting for a rather traditional juke show. From the commentary, it doesn't seem as if it's bothering everyone equally. I just feels unnecessary to me.
Posted: 4/19/25 at 11:32am
Auggie27 said: "This conceit of Groff as a character reminds me of - wait for it - The Skin of Our Teeth, wherein Sabina is really Lily, an actress playing Sabina who surfaces throughout all three acts. I raise it because it's not a new device but wonder why it's being used outside of a nightclub setting for a rather traditional juke show. From the commentary, it doesn't seem as if it's bothering everyone equally. I just feelsunnecessary to me."
I gather it's because, as Groff said in an interview, when they were doing a workshop in a church basement, he opened the show by saying (as himself) "this isn't the first time I've played straight in a church." He felt it established a connection with the audience to talk to them out of character.
Posted: 4/19/25 at 3:36pm
Auggie27 said: "This conceit of Groff as a character reminds me of - wait for it - The Skin of Our Teeth, wherein Sabina is really Lily, an actress playing Sabina who surfaces throughout all three acts. I raise it because it's not a new device but wonder why it's being used outside of a nightclub setting for a rather traditional juke show. From the commentary, it doesn't seem as if it's bothering everyone equally. I just feelsunnecessary to me."
The more comments I read about this show, the more I think it's just about Groff and not Darin. Darin was a known playboy, the only time he didn't sleep with every woman in sight and sometimes 2 at a time was when he was with Sandra Dee. The first time he had sex was when he found his "father" in bed with a woman and the dad asked her to break him in. Groff seems to want to make a point of his being gay, which I doubt anyone cares about besides him.
Posted: 4/19/25 at 4:30pm
It's not like Groff browbeats people with this information in the show. What I recall were humorous anecdotes that provided a bit of context.
Updated On: 4/19/25 at 04:30 PM
Posted: 4/19/25 at 6:29pm
After watching a handful of various clips on social media, I'm avoiding this at all costs. The headlining cruise ship concept just doesn't do it for me, especially with Groff not making any effort to evoke Bobby Darin in any way AND let's not get me started on those backup dancers and their overzealous energy. Everything just looks so damn tacky and cheap - including the costuming for Sandra Dee and Connie Francis. Could they have not a least attempted to make THEM resemble the women they are portraying? This definitely is a missed opportunity and I think they could have honored Bobby Darin if they simply recreated the Copacabana night club with Bobby Darin telling his story and keeping the background dancers evoking that 60s night club performance style instead of the annoying perky high energy crap they're doing. And at least ook at actual photos of the people being portrayed and try to at least recreate the actual person and not some stereotype of anyone of that era and not that particular person.
