There's just so many songs that could work in a musical. Songs like "That Particular Time" for instance, could tell the entire story of two people's relationship.
But like I said before, most of her songs can do that because Alanis is a BRILLIANT storyteller. And that's exactly what you need to tell a story on stage through music.
I remember when "You Oughta Know" came out. I heard it on the radio and wondered who she was, and when they said her name I was blown away cause I was obsessed with "You Can't Do That on Television". Went out and bought the CD, and I probably listened to it every day for months. I hadn't even thought about her for years until last week I randomly stumbled across the full album on youtube. If you haven't listened to it in a while, or ever, do. It is ****ing amazing, holds up so well and every single song is just so great.
Don't know how well this will translate to stage, but if the dude who worked on Next To Normal is behind it I have faith.
I don't think it's a tremendously great idea, but that song book is really rich. Whether or not the show is any good doesn't matter that much to me, they're really great songs.
You do raise a good point has she or is she interested in writing for the stage? She's very familiar with the form as she was a huge advocate for Jane Eyre and did the Cole Porter movie.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
Just to clarify, my other posts, I don't think it's a bad idea. Just a very tricky one. The problem is that Alanis's biggest hits were off of the "angry" album and were the "angry" songs (but One Hand In My Pocket is a big exception).
Most (not all) of the other songs you've mentioned aren't well known, were not big hits, and regardless of whether or not this is a standard jukebox musical, that's what most audiences will think, especially if you call it Jagged Little Pill, and sell it as Alanis's show.
In other words, producers and marketers will push it and push the well known "angry" songs. Those will be hard to sell theatrically. If a character who hasn't earned the right to rant "goes off" in a musical, you run the risk of losing a lot of your audience, me included. They won't understand why the characters are so pissed and hurt and mad, and it will be a big turn off.
And back to what Jordy was saying, if you throw in some of her lesser known (but equally good) songs, and add some new ones, then audiences will wonder what happened to all the hits. They are going to view this as Morrissette's Mamma Mia! or Jersey Boys anyway, whether they like it or not. And calling it "Jagged Little Pill" sets it up to be just that.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
My guess is that producers and audiences would look at it more like AMERICAN IDIOT. The retro kitsch factor that exists for both MAMMA MIA and JERSEY BOYS doesn't exist for Morissette's songbook. If I were a bettin' man, I'd wager that every track from Jagged Little Pill will make it into the show and then be supplemented by her other work. And if it works and is successful, maybe it will encourage her to write a wholly original musical.
That first album is still insanely popular with people so I'd assume the majority of it was used. Pretty much every time I see her in concert she plays most songs from it and then picks one or two songs from other albums to fill up the set list. And that never fails to upset me. Her last concert at the release of HAVOC, I was really praying to hear some stuff from SUPPOSED FORMER INFATUATION JUNKIE and UNDER RUG SWEPT and she sang one song from each because she had to sing the entire JAGGED album and songs from the new one.
I really hope she can use this musical to showcase her far superior songs and get people who might not be aware that she's still as active in the industry as she is (since she's not played on the radio) to renew interest in her music.
Well, they're going to have to balance it emotionally, somehow, hopefully just the way you're saying, otherwise they're going to have an "angry little musical."
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
But that's not true. The album isn't an "angry" album. There are some "angry" songs on it but that's like saying GYPSY is about a lamb. There's a song about a lamb but that doesn't mean it's what it's about.
Oh, come on! If you know her career and that album as well as you say you do, then you know exactly how it was perceived and received when it came out.
The "lamb" is One Hand In My Pocket.
The rest of the hits were a lion, either angry, furious, pissed, ticked, or miffed. Degrees of bitter.
Brilliant, yes. But let's not change history.
EDIT: There's a reason the album is called "Jagged Little Pill."
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
I'm confused... I'm not familiar with the entire album - but of the ones that were hits on the radio, there is one "really angry" one (You Outta Know). This is how I would describe the others:
Hand in My Pocket - definitely not angry... more fun and carefree (and a little rebellious)
Ironic - not really angry either... more "bad luck" than anything - in a somewhat humorous way (could be a poignant, reflective moment in the musical..)
You Learn - if anything this is "triumph over adversity"... not angry
Head over Feet - unabashedly romantic
All I Really Want - more a confessional to a partner than anything. Needy.. not angry.
That's quite a collection of diversity right there...
Are the other six songs really angry, furious, pissed, ticked or miffed?
I read a reference to you as "the former angry young woman". Does that label annoy you?
When someone says that I'm angry it's actually a compliment. I have not always been direct with my anger in my relationships, which is part of why I'd write about it in my songs because I had such fear around expressing anger as a woman. I thought I would be retaliated against or physically hit or vilified. Anger has been a really big deal for women: how can we express it without feeling that, as the physically weaker sex, we won't get killed. The alpha-woman was burned at the stake and had her head chopped off in days of old.
"then you know exactly how it was perceived and received when it came out."
Perceived is the operative word here. "You Oughta Know" was one of the biggest hits of the entire decade and was an angry song. Since it was essentially her debut song, it's what introduced most of the world to her so she was given that image. The fact that she performed it on every TV show when grunge was still very popular so she "head banged" the hell out of it gave it a lot of rage. BUT the album as a whole is NOT an angry album. As a-mad points out, of the other songs on it that became hits, no other song has that kind of anger. Some might even say they're "happy" songs.
So even if they went into this show thinking "We're going to make this an ANGRY musical using these songs", they'd be fooling themselves because the music does not fit that. At all.
So, the "tricky" part (as I originally said) will be to convince others that the mellower Morrissette material is just as interesting and relevant. It will be necessary in a stage musical with a storyline, too.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
^ (to best12bars) that makes no sense to me whatsoever... so basically you're saying that since You Outta Know is very angry, and it was very successful, that the "perception" out there is that every song on the album is angry?
Where are you going with this? I have no idea what you're trying to defend... Does the creative team now say - "People are expecting an angry musical, so let's make Hand in my Pocket angry, even if its not intended to be..."