lopside said: "hearthemsing22 said: "BJR said: "An extension is a big factor here. If it's closed, surely a nom and maybe a win. If it's still running at Tony time, I'd make him the current favorite.
Huge hit, tremendous reviews, a performance many have said is revelatory in the part, and to paraphrase, it's his time."
But we all acknowledge someone shouldn't just win an award based on it being "their time" or that a group of people love a performer and think that performer is owed a Tony or anything, yes? We know this?"
I'm far more surprised by the narrative around Groff being that he's overdue for a Tony and that if he wins, it would a legacy win of some kind. As a way of anointing a "Broadway star"? Sure. But overdue??"
I have liked Groff a lot since I saw him in Spring…. That said, how can someone be overdue if they have been in only 4 Broadway shows, once in the chorus of a show that had a very short engagement. To me that makes 3 shows. You cannot be overdue if you have only been in two prior shows.
I hope he wins because I think he did an amazing job; however, we still have Redmayne in an Olivier winning role, male leads in The Notebook and Water for Elephants, Chip Zein (I assume that show will be long closed, however), and Darcy James (plus anyone else I am forgetting about).