"Perfect for US": The NEXT TO NORMAL love thread! — Page 5
Posted: 3/31/09 at 5:39pm
Posted: 3/31/09 at 5:42pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-ng5fgrzvU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QZEKwrsGWs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIg0c5rwgJM
Updated On: 3/31/09 at 05:42 PM
Posted: 3/31/09 at 5:53pm
As good as the show is, it's going to be an uphill battle for it to survive on Broadway. It needs really killer marketing.
Posted: 3/31/09 at 6:16pm
Posted: 3/31/09 at 6:16pm
Obviously the music is great, and its an interesting concept but I still dont like the "One family is about face the music" tagline.
Hopefully the music and concept of the commercials will be enough to get people in the theater, even if they dont give much of an idea about the show.
Posted: 3/31/09 at 6:29pm
Posted: 3/31/09 at 7:04pm
Posted: 3/31/09 at 7:08pm
But, like I've said a million and one times, I hope I'm wrong and it lasts longer.
Posted: 3/31/09 at 7:14pm
Hopefully the reviews/Tonys are good enough to really build a bigger fan base!
Posted: 3/31/09 at 8:01pm
Posted: 3/31/09 at 9:54pm
I'm sure it'll be around for the Tonys, and if they pick a particularly entrancing, fun number they might be able to get a boost from it.
Posted: 3/31/09 at 10:04pm
Posted: 3/31/09 at 10:09pm
If they pick anything other than "Just Another Day" I would be shocked.
But what Passing Strange picked last year shocked me in a negative way so who knows.
Posted: 3/31/09 at 11:33pm
Also maybe because the son was played like a sexy-handsome-driving-force rather than a mercurial, sensitive, multi-dimensional kid of 18. The actor who played the son is very very very attractive and quite the adept musical comedy juvenile, but I didn't really buy him as an 18-year-old boy and I thought he could've been much more interesting, and should've been less "hot" and more vulnerable.
Did we see a different show? I mean, how can you claim that Gabe wasn't Mercurial and multi-dimensional? He's Puck on steroids. And as for his looks, are they supposed to cast a frumpy, less talented actor just to appease your distaste for attractive young men? The poster seems to think that because Aaron is "hot" that Gabe can't be vulnerable. I mean honestly, that post makes NO sense to me. Not to mention
HE'S NOT REAL. HE'S NOT REALLY AN 18 YEAR OLD KID, he is a ghost/delusion.
The bull**** people find to complain about just so they can be the dissenting opinion is astounding.
Updated On: 3/31/09 at 11:33 PM
Posted: 3/31/09 at 11:37pm
As I said/implied before, Aaron Tveit was EXTREMELY engaging. His physical attractiveness aside. I don't go to shows and stare at the hot guy in the background while an intense scene is going on just to get my fix of eye candy. There were several times when I would watch Tveit in the background during scenes that didn't involve him because he was so interesting to watch. Every line affected him in some way, and he had clear wants and inner life.
I don't see how anyone could think otherwise of his performance.
EDIT: And that post in which the author talks about how it made them think of March of the Falsettos and how it was inferior to it...? I love me some March of the Falsettos, but N2N is nothing like it. At all. They both deal with a family with issues. That's all.
Updated On: 3/31/09 at 11:37 PM
Posted: 3/31/09 at 11:41pm
And honestly, Gabe's malevolence is just another piece of evidence to add to the pile fro the theory of he's a ghost rather than a delusion.
Posted: 3/31/09 at 11:49pm
Updated On: 4/1/09 at 11:49 PM
Posted: 3/31/09 at 11:52pm
Posted: 4/1/09 at 12:01am
Yeah, that's one of those Puck moments. Moving the purse full of pills down stage is another, putting box of his baby things out.
But at the same time he's affected by the decision's diana makes. he's CLEALRY hurt after the Hypnosis when Diana decides to go along with Dr. Madden, and at the end, when he forces Dan to acknowledge him, it's not malevolent at all, Its clear (it used to be clearer, back during the FE days) that Gabe is looking for that moment. He clearly wants dan to acknowledge him.
Posted: 4/1/09 at 12:14am
Also, I don't think Gabe is the same being, whether it be a ghost or a hallucination, for any of the three family members. I don't take the part during I'm Alive when he "gives" Diana's purse to Natalie quite so literally. He's not in Natalie's life like he is in Diana's, but it is his spirit and presence in the family's life that never leaves Natalie alone and that is what eventually drives her to take her mother's drugs.
The way I interpret the show, each character "sees" Gabe differently.
Updated On: 4/1/09 at 12:14 AM
Posted: 4/1/09 at 12:22am
Posted: 4/1/09 at 12:24am
Posted: 4/1/09 at 12:29am
Tveit is good, but I would hardly call his performance Tony worthy. Then again, the Featured Actor in a Musical race is slim this year. Jbara was much better than him and Kudisch was better as well in 9 TO 5. Just my two cents.
Posted: 4/1/09 at 12:42am
BroadwayWorld TV