I've said it before and I'll say it again. Arthur Laurents had the good fortune to be involved in the creation of two of Broadway's real winners. He was NOT the reason for those shows' success. From the get-go, even devout WSS fans have admitted that the weak link, if there was one, was the book. It's the music and the dancing that make that beloved show soar and have placed it in the Broadway pantheon. The original Gypsy owed much to the super-charged performance of Ethel Merman and subsequent productions have followed suit: no Rose, no show, period. Mr. L. WANTS to believe he was the motor but he wasn't. And what else do we have: Time of the Cuckoo? Invitation to a March? He's a nasty, mean-spirited SOB who, on two occasions, lucked out, IMO. And he's a dirty old man, into the bargain.
BroadwayEd