#1
Posted: 8/3/23 at 6:19pm
Updated On: 8/3/23 at 06:19 PM
Rights to A Chorus Line pulled after theatre removes black role from show
#2
Posted: 8/3/23 at 6:53pm
They are blaming the cancelation on a hard working volunteer due to an unfortunate mistake. Might there have been something a little deeper going on?
#3
Posted: 8/3/23 at 6:53pm
Did they not know Richie could be switched to a white actor? It's been done plenty of times before.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
#4
"Hey little girls, look at all the men in shiny shirts and no wives!" - Jackie Hoffman, Xanadu, 19 Feb 2008
Posted: 8/3/23 at 8:45pm
While I think it's good that the blog brought this to light, did we really need 2/3 of the piece being him finger-wagging about what he would've done?
"Hey little girls, look at all the men in shiny shirts and no wives!" - Jackie Hoffman, Xanadu, 19 Feb 2008
#5
Posted: 8/3/23 at 8:45pm
I think we SHOULD hear about these things....there are too many theaters that think its perfectly all right to make changes, just because they want/need to. They never thing the rights holder will know.
CAN Ritchie be played by a whit actor? With permission? (I'm not saying your wrong, just that I don't know that to be true.)
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#6
Posted: 8/3/23 at 11:23pm
Richie can be played by a white actor. it's happened countless times. The line "and I'm black" just gets removed. Even professional productions have used a white actor in the role. The equity tour back in 2009 had to use a white actor to cover the role as both Donald C. Shorter Jr. and Kevin Curtis were both out sick/injured.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
#7
Posted: 8/4/23 at 2:06am
Intetesting, tbanks for the info .
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#8
Posted: 8/4/23 at 4:11am
Instead of blaming the messenger, it would be interesting to find out more about the management and backers of this theater group. Some very strange things have been happening with censorship and cancellation of minorities as of late around the country, so this shouldn't just be dismissed out of hand.
#9
Posted: 8/4/23 at 6:58am
Simply check the website or history of the area theaters in that community. This appears to be a quite large community theater headquartered in a former vaudeville theater. Community theater or not, they have a certain responsibility to audiences and rights holders. The rights holders, Concord Theatricals, apparently found legal reason to pull back the rights. I'd like to hear thier rational for removing the role of Richie. What happens to the characters storyline, songs ?
Just because it's community theater doesn't give them license to be bad or do bad. I've seen some very good community theater. They also charge for thier tickets. So if people are paying to see "A Chorus line" ,they deserve to see "A Chorus Line", not "A chorus Line jr" or sans Richie.
#10
Posted: 8/4/23 at 9:33am
Dom P, I agree. I just don’t think that pulling the rights mere days before opening and throwing out the time and effort of all of the non-guilty parties is the solution in this kind of situation. And I find Peterson’s continued “how dare they!” online takedowns of amateur organizations to be punching down rather than up.
#11
Posted: 8/4/23 at 10:12am
Several posts were removed for violating our personal attacks rule. We welcome discussion on the situation as long as the conversation remains on topic - but kindly ask you refrain from making posts disparaging specific individuals. We appreciate your cooperation.
#12
Posted: 8/4/23 at 10:33am
Dom P said: "I'd like to hear thier rational for removing the role of Richie. What happens to the characters storyline, songs ?"
Their rationale was they couldn't find anyone who was AA to play the role. The blog post suggests they didn't try very hard after the first round of auditions. According to the blog, a month before opening, the company was advertising it was looking for a Mark - but did not, at the same time, seek out people for Richie.
It's not clear what they were going to do with the Richie parts.
#13
Posted: 8/4/23 at 12:31pm
The script literally notes the alternatives for:
- Non-African American Richie
- Non-Asian Connie
- Non-Hispanic Paul & Diana
- Alternative if Judy isn't a tall, skinny redhead.
Makes me wonder if they didn't have the authorized script?
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
#14
Posted: 8/4/23 at 1:36pm
If they didn't have an authorized script, they couldn't have the rights pulled, and would have rec'd a cease and desist order.
Perhaps, they felt they were doing a morally correct thing by not casting a traditionally black role with a white actor (regardless of what notes might say around permissions.) Dont get me wrong, what they did violates their agreement, so their rights SHOULD have been pulled.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $70
Tickets From $106
Tickets From $159