hearthemsing22 said: "While yes, Groban would be a huge draw for the tour, the risk of backlash if he is out is extremely high. People would buy tickets, but could you imagine how many theaters would have to figure out options if he calls out?? I highly doubt he will tour. But it's so amusing seeing people online who say the show won't be the same without him. PUH-LEASE. I roll my eyes so hard they fall out of my head. That's an insane opinion to have. How many revivals have gone on tour and succeeded without big names or the OBC's being part of it? I'll wait for their response to that.
I kind of doubt Jeanna will tour as well, but we'll see!"
No show is the same when there is a change in leads. Even when everyone tries really hard to keep things the same, they still aren't the same. This is a perfectly reasonable argument to make. If your eyes are rolling out of your head when considering such an argument, it makes me wonder how many original casts and replacement/ touring casts you have seen and been able to compare to. Similar? Sure. The same? Never.
I am reminded of the absolutely dreadful David Hess leading the last touring production of Sweeney Todd. Let me assure you, the show was absolutely not the same when compared to the Broadway run, and much of the Broadway cast was on tour with Hess.
Let's also not kid ourselves into thinking that this production would be happening without Groban. He is the entire reason this revival exists at all. That's not to say that I think he would tour with the show. I don't. However, I can understand why many would guess that he might, especially after the successful mini-tour Into the Woods recently completed.
Hopefully whoever does tour with the show does a great (or even better) job, but don't kid yourself into thinking it will be the same as seeing it with Groban and the Broadway cast. It won't be, and try not to let your eyes roll out of your head when people tell you it's not.