chrishuyen said: "Saw this tonight and thought it was really great. I've been a huge Samuel D. Hunter fan since Case for the Existence of God and I'm willing to see anything he's written, but I was afraid I had overhyped his writing in my mind going into this. It started off a bit slow for me but by the third scene I remembered why I loved his writing so much and how rich his characters are. I don't think it's quite as resonant for me as Case, and I'm not sure I fully understand the character motivations in transitioning to the last scene (or whether that's intended to be a mystery), but overall it's a fantastic two-hander and both actors do great work with it."
Case for the Existence of God was one of the best things Ive seen in the last decade, if ever, so I was bound to be disappointed by this, and I guess I was. It felt slow to me--the staging was maybe a little too straightforward, or, as someone else said, because it begins in the dark, it felt sleepy? Like Liberation, the set up is integral to the story (meetings in a gym, a buncha conversations over phones/zooms) but also hurts the drama of it. It perks up as it moves along and we meet more characters, but it never launched for me. Which is not to say I didnt enjoy it, because by the end I was all in, but unlike his other work, if there were deep thoughts worth exploring here, I missed them (at least for now).
THAT SAID- what acting. What performances. Brian J Smith was good, until he just was great and broke my heart, made the play breathe. And Paul Sparks makes some odd choices (if hes trying to be funny, I think he misses the mark) but he BECOMES two entirely different men, who could not be less similar in terms of accent/appearance, and he just pulls it off without so much as a costume change. Seriously next level work from both of them, and I was wiping away tears by the final, beautiful, simple moment.
a credit to Hunter that I was underwhelmed and still overcome with emotion.