a. Implicating Patti in any way is absurd. Even if the entire cast follows her cue, the woman isn't all seeing and all knowing of everything in the theater. The audience could have been making a commotion about ANYTHING. What if somebody just fell down a few stairs and the ushers were helping them back to their feet? That would certainly attract a large part of the section near where it happened and in turn spark the curiostiy of the rest of the theater. Or like the "mentally impaired theater patrons" thread brought to discussion, what if someone were moaning as a result of Down Syndrome and therefore causing a comotion? From all published accounts it doesn't sound like anyone screamed bloody murder at the top of their lungs to "GET A DOCTOR!" so I don't see where Patti's cue to stop the show is.
It seems people don't realize that these actors are on a stage with lights on them acting and not able to see much further than the 7-8th row.
b. Put yourself in the position of the performer. They're basically in the heat of their scene concentrating like there IS a 4th wall present and there is a loud noise somewhere way out of their eyesight and conscienciousness. Nobody is screaming for an ambulance but some moans/crying are heard along with some rumblings in the audience.
Would your first instinct be "Gee, something must have fallen on somebody's HEAD in a full ecquiped theater in 2008 and I'm sure the theater personelle cannot handle it so I'll have to take matters into my own hands and stop the show."
I think not.
c. Insurance-ly speaking (i.e Who's gonna pay up):
Is the physical state of a theater during the run of a show the responsibility of that particular production or that of the actual property owners?
In short, if this woman were to sue, would she be suing the production and money would be coming out of profits or would she be suing the St. James (Organization?)?
(I am sorry and concerned for all involved, just responding to the claims throughout the thread)
Updated On: 3/4/08 at 08:53 PM