Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
#151

TITANÍQUE Reviews

Saw it off broadway. It was fine for what it is. Didn’t feel the need to see it again. Marla Mindelle had the mannerisms down but her voice is no Celine. That being said, it was an inspired and memorable performance and more worthy than the actress who won the Tony.

#152

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

Is the balcony closed off? Their social media team put out a recording of Mindelle’s last entrance and they pan to show the audience applauding, but suspiciously do not stop short of showing the balcony.
#153

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

Observation said: "Is the balcony closed off? Their social media team put out a recording of Mindelle’s last entrance and they pan to show the audience applauding, but suspiciously do not stop short of showing the balcony."

Its been closed the entire run.

#154

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

I had a blast back in may, and honestly thought they would get way worse grosses for this broadway run, may they have a good life on tour or whatsever.
#155

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

Kad said: "MB124 said: "ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "Godspeed to the cast, and to the producers on those lawsuits that Philip Boroff reported the other day! (That whole GM situation and who knew what when is still very shady to me, imo)"

Can someone explain these situations in layman’s terms?
"

The tl:dr version is that the GM of the off-Bway production was found to have, amongst other things, defrauded the production by diverting funds and taking out loans in its name and covered it up by cooking its books so it looked profitable when it very much wasn’t.

One of the issues as it relates to the Broadway production is that the timelines suggest the fraud was discovered around the time Eva Price (whose management company the criminal GM worked for and whose other productions received some of the fraudulently-obtained loans) would have been getting investors on board for the Broadway production, which means that if financial data citing profitability from the off-Broadway production was used in pitches, it would have been fraudulent. As of now, there don’t seem to be any lawsuits related to that, but considering the Broadway production rarely had any profitable weeks, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to think there may be investors who feel misled and may pursue something.
"

Separate from the above, there have been claims of authorship throughout the run by Alex Ellis (original Rose), Kathy Deitch (original Molly Brown), and Nicholas Connell (music supervisor/arranger). Though it’s always hard to tell what’s a legitimate grievance vs people who are merely salty.

#156

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

MadsonMelo said: "I had a blast back in may, and honestly thought they would get way worse grosses for this broadway run, may they have a good life on tour or whatsever."

This will tour for awhile. And it'll be done in numerous regional and community theaters.


A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
#157

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "Kad said: "MB124 said: "ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "Godspeed to the cast, and to the producers on those lawsuits that Philip Boroff reported the other day! (That whole GM situation and who knew what when is still very shady to me, imo)"

Can someone explain these situations in layman’s terms?
"

The tl:dr version is that the GM of the off-Bway production was found to have, amongst other things, defrauded the production by diverting funds and taking out loans in its name and covered it up by cooking its books so it looked profitable when it very much wasn’t.

One of the issues as it relates to the Broadway production is that the timelines suggest the fraud was discovered around the time Eva Price (whose management company the criminal GM worked for and whose other productions received some of the fraudulently-obtained loans) would have been getting investors on board for the Broadway production, which means that if financial data citing profitability from the off-Broadway production was used in pitches, it would have been fraudulent. As of now, there don’t seem to be any lawsuits related to that, but considering the Broadway production rarely had any profitable weeks, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to think there may be investors who feel misled and may pursue something.
"

Separate fromthe above, there have been claims of authorship throughout the run by Alex Ellis (original Rose), Kathy Deitch (original Molly Brown), and Nicholas Connell (music supervisor/arranger). Though it’s always hard to tell what’s a legitimate grievance vs people who are merely salty.
"

I think this is the real canary in the coalmine. Cooking the numbers for Broadway + no ROFR for the original cast + the authorship claims... how is there not some kind of injunction on future productions while this mess gets sorted out?


I'm just here so I don't get fined
#158

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

I give less credence to the authorship and ROFR claims because as reported by Kathy Deitch they, frankly, did not make a lot of sense. And as far as I'm aware, there have been no legal actions taken. As far as I understood it, the authorship claims were more along the lines of "changes were made at my suggestion" and "lines I came up with were made part of the script" which are hard to prove and credit (and are also kind of normal parts of development of a show and tbh I don't think merit any kind of authorship credit).


"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

Updated On: 9/21/26 at 11:42 AM

#159

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

GottaGetAGimmick420 said: "ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "Kad said: "MB124 said: "ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "Godspeed to the cast, and to the producers on those lawsuits that Philip Boroff reported the other day! (That whole GM situation and who knew what when is still very shady to me, imo)"

Can someone explain these situations in layman’s terms?
"

The tl:dr version is that the GM of the off-Bway production was found to have, amongst other things, defrauded the production by diverting funds and taking out loans in its name and covered it up by cooking its books so it looked profitable when it very much wasn’t.

One of the issues as it relates to the Broadway production is that the timelines suggest the fraud was discovered around the time Eva Price (whose management company the criminal GM worked for and whose other productions received some of the fraudulently-obtained loans) would have been getting investors on board for the Broadway production, which means that if financial data citing profitability from the off-Broadway production was used in pitches, it would have been fraudulent. As of now, there don’t seem to be any lawsuits related to that, but considering the Broadway production rarely had any profitable weeks, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to think there may be investors who feel misled and may pursue something.
"

Separate fromthe above, there have been claims of authorship throughout the run by Alex Ellis (original Rose), Kathy Deitch (original Molly Brown), and Nicholas Connell (music supervisor/arranger). Though it’s always hard to tell what’s a legitimate grievance vs people who are merely salty.
"

I think this is the real canary in the coalmine. Cooking the numbers for Broadway + no ROFR for the original cast + the authorship claims... how is there not some kind of injunction on future productions while this mess gets sorted out?
"

Somewhere in the mix of this story the producers sued the GM and won a 4 million plus decision, the GM was supposedly a no show or didn't contest. The off Broadway investors are now probably suing the producers for their piece of that award if its ever paid.


Up In One
#160

Re: TITANÍQUE Reviews

Remind me — when profit sharing deals have been done for casts in the past, does it only kick in post-recoupment, or is it on the authors’ weekly royalty from the start of performances?

It would be a nice gesture to allocate ~5% split among the original casts, since I gather there was a TON of improv that got approved and typed by the credited authors. But if that wouldn’t start paying until the show recoups, then it might be more of a slap in the face than a benefit, since this thing can’t seem to make money (though maybe the tour will change that).

Updated On: 9/21/26 at 07:47 PM

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $71
Hot Show
Tickets From $67