To WishIhadaTony...
Just wanted to correct a few facts in your post...
The original INTO THE WOODS ran almost 2 years (764 perfs) so it clearly found an audience. Variety reported that as of the closing it had not fully paid off (few shows do these days) but the income from the tour pushed it into the black. In the latest TSR it is Sondheim's most popular show with over 100 productions listed.
Bernadette Peters was never submitted for Tony consideration that year because when she joined the production (after Betty Buckley departed) she stipulated in her contract that she would have to leave the show after 3 months to keep a prior agreement to appear in a film. The film was delayed and she extended her stay in WOODS to 5 months. By Tony time she had been replaced by Phylicia Rashad, and the producers felt (rightly so) that Joanna Gleason would have the best chance of winnng the Tony award. (The Tony was presented to her by Bernadette and Joanna made a point of thanking her in her speech.)
You are correct in saying that Sondheim's shows cannot always be fully appreciated in one viewing and yes, sometimes after a first encounter you aren't sure what to make of it all. Critics too. Many of them missed what SUNDAY was all about until Frank Rich kept championing it and others were persuaded to return and take another look. Same with ASSASSINS. The original off-Broadway production got terrible reviews, yet many of the same critics lavishly praised both the revival production and the show itself.
Now, in this day and age when everyone wants fast food and fast service and instant gratification yes these shows may be off-putting because they demand that you a) PAY ATTENTION and B) THINK ABOUT WHAT IS BEING SAID.
I was sent to NYC to review the original WOODS and the same weekend one of the first post-opening performances of PHANTOM.
I knew then and there that WOODS would get Tonys for best book and score because it is so much better written, but that PHANTOM would take best musical on the strength of its production values. If the lyrics and text of PHANTOM had delved more into the character's mindsets it could have been a fantasic score instead of having lush tunes set with empty lyrics.
Much as I enjoyed WOODS at that first visit, I enjoyed it even more later after I had heard the OCR. A subsequent visit to POTO (12 years later) did nothng to change my opinion and I learned nothing new. Everything was there on the surface to be gleaned the first time. SO why people go back and see POTO over and over I don't get. But I do understand why people go back to see Sondheim's shows again and again (like the six wonderful stagings in Washington 2 years ago) and enjoy them more on subsequent visits.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com