Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
WalkingInSpace3
Swing Joined: 3/24/13
#1Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 4:08amThe first national tour will "close" after its stop in L.A., but I've heard rumor of the tour being re-contracted and relaunched. I wouldn't think there would be both an equity (2nd national - currently running) and a non-eq tour. Any info on this? Updated On: 1/21/15 at 04:08 AM
#2Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 5:16amFrom what I remember it won't be non-equity but they are cutting costs and starting anew under different contracts that will pay the actors less.
neonlightsxo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/29/08
#2Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 9:30amThat's awful. Wicked is a cash cow, they can afford to put the actors on production contracts.
#3Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 9:44am^I was thinking the same thing!
broadwayguy2
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/18/03
#4Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 10:50am
There are a few ways to look at this.
Yes, Wicked is a cash cow.
Yes, I would safely assume the new company - when it goes back on the road. - will be UNION.
No, Wicked will be on the road in a non-Equity company for years.
As far as new contract types, I think it important to note that it is not always about actor SALARY, so do not necessarily knock that, as you regardless or contract type, you will not know what those actors are being paid. Merely what the contractual. minimum is.
The Wicked first national is a behemoth. I honestly find it a bit illogical. Since opening the first national, Wicked has also found numerous ways to be more efficient and closing this company allows that to start fresh and incorporate all that they have learned.
Yes, that might mean several fewer swings, etc. the show does not necessarily need ten swings and that is a HUGE burden on the road.
It also means that they can clean house easily... It is very difficult to get ride of ensemble members, even if they grow out of a role and are no longer appropriate for the show, and especially if they sign new contract riders and get pay bumps every 6 months. Sometimes you have to say " this ensemble is no longer right for the show" and you can't fix that without closing, or paying out a prohibitive amount of money. I won't bother enumerating here.
A new contract type also may expand the venues they can play. Contract types outline certain venue requirements and they may feel that the first national has saturated that market.
There are endless factors that can be at play here that have NOTHING to do with the actors' salaries.
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#5Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 10:53amElphie can just as easily bounce on a mini-tramp at the end of Defying Gravity.
CathyFromLex
Swing Joined: 10/9/13
#6Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 11:37amOr maybe there is only just so long you can run 2 North American tours.
#7Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 11:43am
Not a chance in hell. Equity is already waging a campaign to express their irritation with the amount of non-Eq tours, no way they're going to let something like this happen.
broadwayguy2
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/18/03
#8Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 1:17pm
Equity is waging a well intentioned, very political, mostly unrealistic ( from their end ) campaign of misguided attempts at a noble cause.
To be honest, I would relish them going toe to toe with a large producer because, perhaps, a productive dialogue could be had rather than everyone setting their hair on fire.
It is difficult to maintain two tours. Wicked is able to do it. Unfortunately, I think presenters are catching on (finally!) that the second national is leaner and requires less down time for the venues. Therefore, it makes sense to close the first national, retool it and open it again as the third national in a leaner production that maintains the visual integrity if the show while allowing for a speedier load in like the second national, and can offer them flexibility in the venues they book.
neonlightsxo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/29/08
#9Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 1:26pm^ If that's all that's happening, there's nothing wrong with that. As long both tours remain Equity and on a good contract.
JohnyBroadway
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/10/12
#10Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 1:32pmIt has been on the road for 10 years. Some in house revamp and clean up is necessary. And I am sure presenters aren't dying to book to the show like they have been in the past 3-5 years. Engagements have to be dwindling down. Also, I do not ever think they would want non-equity as part of the Wicked brand.
#11Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 1:34pm
Not a chance in hell. Equity is already waging a campaign to express their irritation with the amount of non-Eq tours, no way they're going to let something like this happen.
Equity doesn't have a say when a non-Equity production company puts out a non-Equity tour. They can't stop it from happening.
Updated On: 1/21/15 at 01:34 PM
Liza's Headband
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/28/13
#13Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 1:49pmI didn't mean that Equity could put a stop to it, but they'd be pissed and certainly wouldn't be shy about expressing that. And I'm sure that's a headache the producers of Wicked wouldn't like to deal with.
#14Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 1:56pmEquity can't do anything. They have been bitching about this for over 20 years. I remember 17 years ago when Troika had a non union tour of 42 street. The performances were met at every stop with union protests. They were handing out flyers to make sure that people were aware that what they were seeing was a non union, non professional production. It kind of bit them in the ass a little because it happened to be a wonderful first rate production that did very well. The upcoming changes for Wicked will probably be in the way they run the every day production and financials of the tour. I don't think the audience will experience anything differently.
broadwayguy2
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/18/03
#15Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 2:09pm
Equity bites themselves in the behind every time they pull out that "Non-Union employees are not real professionals" card.
It only gets made worse every time you see a dedicated company of non-union actors put their heart into a performance and then turn around and see an Equity tour where a few ensemble members sleep walk through the show and mark everything because they know they won't be fired and will make a mint of free money if they are.
Liza's Headband
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/28/13
#16Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 3:11pmEquity is actually the biggest joke ever. They treat their union members horrendously but then always take advantage of controversies that will attract the most publicity and attention, just so Wyman can smugly proclaim, Seeee??? We LOVE our union members!!!
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#17Wicked 1st National Tour to go non-equity?
Posted: 1/21/15 at 3:14pm
"They were handing out flyers to make sure that people were aware that what they were seeing was a non union, non professional production."
Colonel Klink handed me a flyer once!! I wasn't there to see the show because I do not see non-union shows in union houses but I was passing by the place where the show was playing. Colonel Klink was super nice.
Videos




