Wonderful Town - Will it Close ? — Page 2
Posted: 9/7/04 at 8:53pm
How old is Brooke Shields? 40? How old does that make our beloved Corine?
Updated On: 9/7/04 at 08:53 PM
Posted: 9/7/04 at 11:39pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 12:52am
Posted: 9/8/04 at 1:10am
Posted: 9/8/04 at 2:17am
http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/28108.htm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 2:53am
Posted: 9/8/04 at 3:01am
Posted: 9/8/04 at 9:23am
Updated On: 9/8/04 at 09:23 AM
Posted: 9/8/04 at 12:19pm
Too much of that complicated "talk-singing"? Is Berstein too intellectual? It's old-school musical comedy. How much more song-and-dancy can you get? It won the Tony and Pulitzer. And most importantly, how do you know it sucks if you haven't seen it? What are you, 12?
Posted: 9/8/04 at 12:22pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 12:33pm
I loved everything about it.
Please stop starting nasty rumors. It is a great evening at the theater.
I am sick of Riedel bashing Donna Murphy!
Riedel should give it a rest.
Oh, and DP I AM 104!
Updated On: 9/8/04 at 12:33 PM
Posted: 9/8/04 at 1:23pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 1:51pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 2:03pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 2:07pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 2:16pm
THE WOMAN HAS HEALTH PROBLEMS. It must be something serious or else she wouldn't miss so many shows - she is much too professional for that. Give her a break. She definitely gives her ALL when she is out on that stage- halfa**ing it would be beneath her, and us, too. I can't believe you even suggested it.
P.S. Spiritoflaw I like your icon. Where did you find that picture?
Posted: 9/8/04 at 2:54pm
Still doesn't suck.
Posted: 9/8/04 at 3:03pm
Of Thee I Sing
South Pacific
Fiorello
How To Succeed
A Chorus Line
Sunday In The Park WIth George
Rent
Posted: 9/8/04 at 3:10pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 3:13pm
Updated On: 9/8/04 at 03:13 PM
Posted: 9/8/04 at 6:08pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 9:02pm
Posted: 9/8/04 at 9:03pm
Auggie is right, though: if Donna Murphy has health problems, she should take a set time off, rather than perform once in awhile, depending on how she feels. Right now, what she is doing is unprofessional, because many people are expecting her to perform, especially because she is an above-the-title star. If she announced a two month break for herself, or backed out of the production altogether, that is much better, both for her career and for audience's expectations, than th "will Donna show up tonight?" situation we have now.
In my opinion, West Side Story should have won too. I assume the Pulitzer is more prestigious than the Tony, is that correct?
Yes, the Pulitzer is a very prestigious prize, but it's not a set of prizes for drama or even specifically excellence in drama. Rather (and someone correct me if I'm wrong), the Pulitzer is awarded to work of high calibre that somehow makes a statement about the socio-political-artistic climate, or the human condition in general. There are Pulitzers for journalism, fiction, and others as well. The Pulitzer Prize for Drama isn't some sort of higher Tony. Thus, I don't think West Side Story would have been eligible, because it's pretty much just a retelling of Romeo & Juliet, with some basic themes about the racial divide.
Updated On: 9/8/04 at 09:03 PM
Posted: 9/8/04 at 9:45pm
The Pulitzers' reputation lies chiefly with its journalism prizes (which are still highly valued) -- the drama award is seen as prestigious to the general public mostly because the "name" somehow has come to be synonymous with some sort of excellence -- the problem is that that excellence has had much more to do with the journalism prizes and not the drama and poetry awards which have often completely missed the boat (but the public doesn't know this). Nevertheless, I suppose it helps the playwright's reputation and perhaps give a slight nudge to the box office if the play is still running (and ensures that the play will be done around the country and beyond in rep for the next generation), but most who really follow theatre don't give it a lot of respect because they have gotten it so wrong so often through years.
The NY Drama Citics Circle Awards, the Drama Desks and the Obies are generally considered to have had the best track records throughout the years at selecting the outstanding plays and musicals for each given season.
The Tonys are administered by the American Theatre Wing and the League of American Producers -- i.e. all the big Broadway producers and theatre owners ..... basically a club of rich guys who decided in 1947 to come up with a bunch of awards that they could give to themselves. For years, no one took them all that seriously. The Tonys really only became the biggest theatre awards when they started televising them nationally in 1967 -- before that they were a just a little annual banquet held at a local hotel ballroom, televised on local NY television, lasting an hour or so most years, with no production numbers or performances by current (or former) Broadway stars, and certainly no long-winded acceptance speeches -- they just weren't a big enough deal for anybody to get too emotional about, thanking agents, voice coaches etc..... But once the producers got the bright idea to sell it to CBS, everything changed and the Tonys became THE awards for the American theatre. Were they/are they about excellence??? Yeah right........
Updated On: 9/8/04 at 09:45 PM
BroadwayWorld TV