Q was awarded for its originality; Pierce was awarded because it was the only thing CURTAINS would win (much like Stew winning for Best Book); PJ GAME was the rejuvenation of a show that hadn't been seen in years, etc, etc.
That's okay, I've been known to spell my own name wrong.
Chicago winning no Tony awards? (I'm not a fan of Chicago, but it did have eleven noms).
Starmites being nominated for "Best Musical."
I guess Spamalot winning over "Light In The Piazza," DRS, and Spelling Bee... but Spamalot is my favourite musical, so that was, for me, cause for rejoicing.
In my pants, she has burst like the music of angels, the light of the sun! --Marius Pantsmercy
While other shows have won Book and Score, but not Best Musical, Urinetown is the only show to have won Book, Score AND Direction, but not Best Musical. In other words, the best written and directed show of the year was somehow not the year's Best Musical. That was a very peculiar year.
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
No nomination for Hermans score of Mack & Mabel. No nomination for Wildhorns score of J/H & giving it to Juan Darien instead. No Tonys for Chicago ACL beating out Chicago as Best Musical Ditto for Starmites Ditto for S/A Choreography.
^To be fair, Starmites basically was nominated by sheer default and simply not to have two revues only vying for Best Musical. 1989 was just a shocker of a year.
I know what you mean, Urban... but I just have a chip on my shoulder about Starmites in general. I'm still bitter that my school chose to put it on, that my non-musical-loving friends who saw our school production are now convinced that all musicals are like Starmites, and that my sister loves to play the cast recording constantly. ^_^
In my pants, she has burst like the music of angels, the light of the sun! --Marius Pantsmercy
AlgonquinProd2 - I dunno. "Follies", while beautiful in score, has one of the deadliest books around. Even a concert version I saw couldn't work with it. While I definately wasn't around then, thus cannot pass a judgement, I can at least understand that decision. Updated On: 9/20/08 at 11:09 AM
I can understand why Bernadette didn't win. A lot of times the Tony Committee, as stupid as this is, votes on how popular the musical/play is. Hairspray was the most popular production of that season. Considering that this happens so much, I'm surprised Aida didn't get a best musical nom., considering that it was red hot, and Wicked not winning best musical was a HUGE shock, that is the most popular show on Broadway since it came out.
Chicago losing to Chorus Line was not a shock. Chicago not winning anything was not a shock. Chicago richly deserved Score, Choreography, Actor and Actress (Donna should have been in Featured Actress. I love her, but her being in Leading defeated the whole purpose of the show and it having NO stars.), however it was pretty well expected that Chorus Line would win everything that evening. The craptacular Two Gentlemen of Verona losing to Follies? That was a shock. But it's very strange when a show wins Book and Score, or at least Score and doesn't win Best Musical. What the hell does Best Musical mean? It should mean the Best Musical. The best written, best performed, best executed piece. Light in the Piazza nearly swept the Tonys in 2005, but still that awful piece of **** Spamalot won Musical. Now after winning Score, Actress and all those design awards, wouldn't the Best Musical obviously be Piazza? Anyone get what I'm saying? Same thing with Follies. It won nearly everything, yet Two Gentleman won. Does Best Musical really mean Best Producer? I hope not because I don't think Papp did a better job producing Two Gentleman than Hal did on Follies. Sure The Prince Office lost money, but I think Follies was a harder show to produce than Papp's. I don't think the Spamalot idiots did a better job producing Spamalot than LCT did for Piazza. So what does it mean? We should just get rid of Best Musical. It means nothing, at least on artistic terms. Best Play is another matter. At least the Author gets it.
Spamalot winning over Light in the Piazza Spring Awakening winning over Grey Gardens Lion King winning over Ragtime
"In theater, the process of it is the experience. Everyone goes through the process, and everyone has the experience together. It doesn't last - only in people's memories and in their hearts. That's the beauty and sadness of it. But that's life - beauty and the sadness. And that is why theater is life." - Sherie Rene Scott
Jerry Herman's speech is a huge part of the reason I don't like him much, and I actually don't enjoy that much of his work.
"He found something that he wanted, had always wanted and always would want— not to be admired, as he had feared; not to be loved, as he had made himself believe; but to be necessary to people, to be indispensable."
-F. Scott Fitzgerald's This Side of Paradise
"AlgonquinProd2 - I dunno. "Follies", while beautiful in score, has one of the deadliest books around. Even a concert version I saw couldn't work with it. While I definately wasn't around then, thus cannot pass a judgement, I can at least understand that decision."
Oh, I don't disagree, I think the book in "Follies" is possibly the weakest of the Sondheim shows. Sadly, however, I WAS around back then and I don't think anyone in the world thought "Verona" would take home the Tony. Actually, I think people felt "Grease" would take it that year.