But isn't there some value in recognizing that the conquest of Native Americans by Europeans was a systematic program of genocide not so very dissimilar to German efforts to rid their "lebensraum" of Jews and Slavs? No, there is not. In that one characteristically wordy sentence, you minimize the lives and deaths of every Native American, Jew and Slav who was slaughtered.
Your simple, simplistic and simple-minded act of odious comparison reduces both programs of genocide, which were carried out under entirely different historical circumstances with entirely different goals, to some supposed "human condition," thereby exonerating all guilty parties and implying that it will undoubtedly "happen again" because "that's what humans do."
No. Genocide is NOT what humans do. It is what humans who become INHUMAN do, and the circumstances that drive them to become inhuman must be studied and understood individually, not lumped together under some facile definition like "SH*T happens."
Hannah Arendt's term "the banality of evil" does NOT mean "the commonality of evil." She would throw up on your shoes if she knew you were twisting her phrase into that.
Plus you use a foofy expression like "not so very dissimilar" that makes my skin crawl and a pretentious German noun (without even capitalizing it correctly), which only serves to make your point, which was objectionable to begin with, even more shallow, callow, callous and crass.