Obama condemns holocaust- predictably, National Review disagrees — Page 5
Posted: 2/5/13 at 3:35pm
But allowing safe passage to those who committed war crimes (which did happen in the US) - well, they should have been sent to Nuremberg and tried.
But, I think the post-war frenzy with the Soviets put what was right behind what was considered in our national security interests. The CIA was heavily involved, and was intent on preventing the Soviets from having access to these scientists.
There was an interest play on the issue called
Apollo
Posted: 2/5/13 at 3:41pm
The Great Cold War: A Journey Through the Hall of Mirrors (Stanford Security Studies)
Gordon Barrass
tells the story of Operation Paperclip and is pretty split down the middle on who was at fault.
Posted: 2/5/13 at 3:41pm
Posted: 2/5/13 at 3:53pm
Posted: 2/5/13 at 4:02pm
Posted: 3/2/13 at 2:46pm

The researchers have cataloged some 42,500 Nazi ghettos and camps throughout Europe, spanning German-controlled areas from France to Russia and Germany itself, during Hitler’s reign of brutality from 1933 to 1945.
The figure is so staggering that even fellow Holocaust scholars had to make sure they had heard it correctly when the lead researchers previewed their findings at an academic forum in late January at the German Historical Institute in Washington.
“The numbers are so much higher than what we originally thought,” Hartmut Berghoff, director of the institute, said in an interview after learning of the new data.
“We knew before how horrible life in the camps and ghettos was,” he said, “but the numbers are unbelievable.”
The documented camps include not only “killing centers” but also thousands of forced labor camps, where prisoners manufactured war supplies; prisoner-of-war camps; sites euphemistically named “care” centers, where pregnant women were forced to have abortions or their babies were killed after birth; and brothels, where women were coerced into having sex with German military personnel.
NY Times: The Holocaust Just Got More Shocking
Updated On: 3/3/13 at 02:46 PM
Posted: 3/2/13 at 6:09pm
I felt the same way when studying slavery in the U.S.
Posted: 3/2/13 at 8:33pm
Posted: 3/3/13 at 1:10am
Posted: 3/3/13 at 7:02am
Updated On: 3/3/13 at 07:02 AM
Posted: 3/3/13 at 8:48am
Posted: 3/3/13 at 8:49am
Sure, you can play the depressed social scientist who smugly wishes to relate all negative aspects and actions of human behavior but I see zero productivity to that path. Nothing positive or worthwhile is to be gained from anything you have said in this thread.
Posted: 3/3/13 at 9:05am
Posted: 3/3/13 at 11:07am
SMH.
What Pal Joey and Beedle said.
Posted: 3/3/13 at 11:35am
By comparing the violence committed against her to the violence committed against millions of people, you are actually putting her in a position of feeling that what was done to her was "not as bad."
Thus, without realizing that you are excusing violence and evil, your false moral equivalence dehumanizes all of the victims and exonerates both the perpetrators of the death camps and the husband of the battered woman.
Only when you stop equating one evil to another evil can you truly understand how humans become inhuman.
Posted: 3/3/13 at 12:17pm
Posted: 3/3/13 at 12:50pm
That unless we acknowledge it's pervasiveness we risk not being able to recognize it and prevent it. We may be less likely to resist it when we ourselves confront it and are potentially swept up in its power to corrupt ordinary people and enlist them in its perpetration.
This is not to take away from the significance of the distinctive qualities of each and every atrocity.
History demands recognition of both the commonality and the specificity of oppression.
Posted: 3/3/13 at 7:03pm
but some people enjoy being seen as victims...
Updated On: 3/3/13 at 07:03 PM
Posted: 3/3/13 at 8:17pm
Rwanda, Kosovo, Darfur...all since...so much for your theory
Posted: 3/3/13 at 8:30pm
Posted: 3/3/13 at 9:55pm
Its not a theory you sad sack of poop. Its a technique to try to improve/save the lives of those who are and those who will be oppressed. We have to keep fighting.
What the hell, exactly, are your arguing here?
Posted: 3/3/13 at 10:27pm
Updated On: 3/3/13 at 10:27 PM
Posted: 3/4/13 at 1:02am
I'm sorry I called you a sack of poop. That was uncalled for.
Posted: 3/4/13 at 4:42am
It is about isolating the atrocities and holding them up to the world individually so that we can even more powerfully reinforce the idea that we as a culture cannot let this happen again.
so much for your theory,
Not "so much for your theory. This IS the theory:
Rwanda should be held up separately, Kosovo should be held up separately, Darfur should be held up separately, Rwanda should be held up separatly Kosovo should be held up separately, a man who hits his wife should be held up separatly, a boy who slaughters an animal should be held up separately, Oscar Pistorius should be held up separately, Pick the atrocity of your choice, and document it and hold it up separately for the world to learn from.
so much for your theory
BroadwayWorld TV