MadsonMelo said: "Jarethan said: "henrikegerman said: "Jarethan said: "henrikegerman said: "love the idea of Ramos as Wolfie. Please please Rylance for Salieri.
If you're asking for bigger names, Cranston woukd ne my first choice.
yes in real life Salieri was only six years older than Mozart, but does it matter?"
I assume a show this big would need an open end, unless a John Doyle approach is used. It would be expensive to present and run.
in a year in which a just-Oscar winner did very good, but not great business (and I assume the investors lost a good part of their investment), I absolutely question whether any of those people could sell enough tickets, minus incredible reviews."
You talk about Chastain? Do we know the capitalization and the running costs for ''A Doll's House''??"
Early on I read that it was capitalized at $6MM, which seems absurd, but that is what it said. If that is true, however, then I highly doubt it made its money back. Do not know the breakeven — they never announce that — but assuming it was $400k, even if every penny over breakeven went to the investors, which is not the case, it would be a squeaker.
The point that I was making is that a show as big as Amadeus would presumably require an open run or a much longer limited run to have any chance at recouping, and that I did not think any of the actors listed could guarantee big sales for a sufficient run. I did not notice Rylance’s name on the list…clearly he would sell a lot more tickets than David Suchet did (at least as I remember).
Coming off of an Oscar following some other great performances, a highly acclaimed TV show that will guarantee her more near-term award consideration, JC sold oodles of tickets (I only bought mine because of her presence), but it did not do as well as I expected; and none of the names on the list of potential Salieri’s seemed likely to sell as many tickets as JC did.