Thanks for posting that, Elphie. I was going to.
This is ridiculous. His comments can make him look stupid, but he isn't stupid. He's RIGHT. Yes, that's a harsh thing to say, especially to the New York Times, but he isn't wrong. The way he says things sometimes make him look like he isn't thinking, but there's a different between blatant stupidity and just not being able to know when to shut your mouth - the latter of which Adam is guilty, sometimes.
His comment reads two-fold. A lot of the theatre is crap. And a lot of the theatre that has music that would be suitable to his voice is crap. The good stuff, things like Piazza, etc - those aren't for him. It's a statement about his style, and a statement about the state of theatre. Trust me, I don't think Adam is someone who thinks he's far too equipped to be making scholarly statements on the state of American musical theatre. It's not as nasty of a comment as people are thinking it is.
Ruprecht's defenses about Adam's reviews are going to fold fast. He wasn't reviewed for Cabaret. He got decent reviews for RENT and mixed ones for AIDA (some negative, though.) What have you go, two? That's really something to call a "track record." HE isn't very young, but his career is not huge yet. And as a musician before anything else, his career isn't dependent on people running after him with theatre offers. And even if he's not the best actor, if you've watched anything of his career, I dare you to deny that he hasn't at least improved. I've seen him act his ass off. Comparing him to Justin Timberlake is one of the biggest insults I've ever seen anyone use against him. Excuse me whilst I vomit.
I can't sit here and watch people say he's a jerk because he's honest. You all KNOW that even though film is no more original than theatre, there's a far wider range of things that end up on film than end up on a Broadway stage. Use your heads and stop throwing stones. You all know I'd fight to the death for him.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 9/4/05 at 07:32 PM