Am I the only one excited about Merrily????? — Page 3
Posted: 10/23/13 at 8:42pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 8:47pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:01pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:05pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:06pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:14pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:34pm
I thoroughly enjoyed the production, but there were a few things that kept me from "loving" it. The little boys British accent was laughable. And as much as I adores Jenna Russell, I honest to God thought she was playing it as a lesbian her attraction to Frank was so nonexistent in this, I really did wonder about it. Please, somebody tell me I'm not alone in thinking this. Lol
And usually the ending of the show just has me sobbing, but my eyes didn't even water up tonight. I can't place my finger on exactly why, though.
Updated On: 10/23/13 at 10:34 PM
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:43pm
How about a petition so After Eight won't spend time on here anymore, period?
But seriously, that was just terrific (with the exception of little Frankie's nonexistent American accent).
Posted: 10/23/13 at 10:43pm
Thanks!
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:06pm
I just got back and wow! That was an amazing and beautiful production. I felt like it was very well done and the acting was superb. Besides the Encores! recording, this is the first time hearing some of the score and seeing the show in any way. I loved it and would love to see it again or download it from Digital Theatre if it becomes available. A job well done by all!
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:12pm
I've never been a fan of MERRILY. I've never been able to find the glimmer of genius everyone else seems to find. Until tonight.
Marie Friedman has done a masterful job with this work. It still doesn't succeed. I doubt it ever will. Frank is just such a scumbag. But the cast... Especially Jenna Russell... wow.
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:18pm
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:36pm
What made me crazy was that thing at the beginning. Nothing irritates me more than showing me scenes of what I'm about to see in ten minutes, instead of just showing me what I paid to see in the first place. And one of them said the moments in the show couldn't be just snapshots and the next person said the moments in the show were just snapshots and then at one point we had to listen to what people in Australia like to do to have fun... It was truly unnecessary. It should have played before it started or at intermission. I thought it was treading over-trod ground for people who knew the show and was pretty spoilerific if you were seeing it for the first time.
I went with two friends who didn't know the show at all. One liked it and one didn't. The one who didn't said at intermission, "It's just so... depressing."
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:48pm
Next time say hi, Jordan!
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:50pm
Was he having a revelation in 70's Hollywood after remembering how it all started in '58?
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:57pm
My partner said "It was okay. The second act was better." and from him, that's high praise.
But I had a good time.
Posted: 10/23/13 at 11:59pm
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:02am
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:04am
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:06am
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:07am
As for the show, I'm very familiar with it, but I've never seen it done. It is still one of my favorite Sondheim shows but I think there are problems inherent in the structure that it will never overcome. It's not even the characters' un-likeablity in beginning, but that the character development of each fills out from top-to-bottom. It's extremely interesting to analyze (because I think the writing is brilliant) but not exactly satisfying. It's so goddamn depressing, but I don't mind that necessarily. I'm going to wait to see a live production, hopefully this one will eventually transfer (with a different set) because I really liked the direction. All that being disjointedly said, the last scene was just so fantastic and pretty perfect musical theatre.
(Oh and this post really doesn't need to be longer, but I read the end as it going back to the 70s, because didn't he have the script in the opening number as well? Or am I imagining that?)
Updated On: 10/24/13 at 12:07 AM
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:17am
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:24am
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:36am
Was not familiar with this work. Saw it tonight for the first time. (Theater in Danbury, CT was 40% full according to the ticket taker.)
In addition to Mary and Frank, was there an unrequited romance between Charley and Frank? It felt like it, especially the way Charley said "I love you," and tried to warn Frank he didn't need to get married.
I thought the behind-the-scenes film at the beginning was misplaced. When I see a show, I want to see it and enjoy it first, then analyze it later. Were they trying to mimic the structure of the play? In any event, poorly done, fail.
My husband didn't care for it all. He said after the opening scene you could predict where it was heading. Maybe that's one of the reasons the show wasn't popular with audiences in the past.
I liked many of the actors. My main issue with the show was the beginning scenes didn't pack as much of a punch as they might have because we didn't know the characters yet. Also, I never understood what Mary did in the group. Was she just overall a "friend."
Overall I would give it a C. It was okay.
Updated On: 10/24/13 at 12:36 AM
BroadwayWorld TV